ghsa-2v8f-3jfm-64p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:57
Modified
2022-05-01 23:57
Details
PowerDNS Recursor before 3.1.6 does not always use the strongest random number generator for source port selection, which makes it easier for remote attack vectors to conduct DNS cache poisoning. NOTE: this is related to incomplete integration of security improvements associated with addressing CVE-2008-1637.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-3217" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-18T16:41:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "PowerDNS Recursor before 3.1.6 does not always use the strongest random number generator for source port selection, which makes it easier for remote attack vectors to conduct DNS cache poisoning. NOTE: this is related to incomplete integration of security improvements associated with addressing CVE-2008-1637.", "id": "GHSA-2v8f-3jfm-64p5", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:57:55Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:57:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3217" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43925" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg01353.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://doc.powerdns.com/changelog.html#CHANGELOG-RECURSOR-3-1-6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31311" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/changeset/1179" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/09/10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/10/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/16/12" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30782" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.