ghsa-2g67-jw5m-244m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-02-03 06:30
Modified
2025-03-26 15:32
Severity ?
Details
sprintf in the GNU C Library (glibc) 2.37 has a buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) in some situations with a correct buffer size. This is unrelated to CWE-676. It may write beyond the bounds of the destination buffer when attempting to write a padded, thousands-separated string representation of a number, if the buffer is allocated the exact size required to represent that number as a string. For example, 1,234,567 (with padding to 13) overflows by two bytes.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-25139", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2023-02-03T06:15:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "sprintf in the GNU C Library (glibc) 2.37 has a buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) in some situations with a correct buffer size. This is unrelated to CWE-676. It may write beyond the bounds of the destination buffer when attempting to write a padded, thousands-separated string representation of a number, if the buffer is allocated the exact size required to represent that number as a string. For example, 1,234,567 (with padding to 13) overflows by two bytes.", id: "GHSA-2g67-jw5m-244m", modified: "2025-03-26T15:32:08Z", published: "2023-02-03T06:30:23Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25139", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230302-0010", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30068", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/02/10/1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.