GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-85014

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-04 17:17 - Updated: 2026-09-04 20:17
Severity
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
undici's experimental WebSocketStream client crashes the whole Node.js process when a remote peer closes the TCP connection without a WebSocket close handshake. On an unclean close the internal socket-close handler calls abort on the writable stream unconditionally and discards the returned promise, but per the WHATWG Streams standard aborting a locked writable returns a promise that rejects with a TypeError. Because the application holds a writer on that writable, which is the only way to write, the rejection is never observed and Node's default unhandled-rejection behavior terminates the process. An untrusted server can therefore crash a client with a single abrupt disconnect, with no authentication and no application mistake. This affects undici versions from 7.0.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2.
References
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-rx4f-c7p8-82vq
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/undici",
          "product": "undici",
          "vendor": "undici",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.29.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.29.1",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.10.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "8.10.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "undici\u0027s experimental WebSocketStream client crashes the whole Node.js process when a remote peer closes the TCP connection without a WebSocket close handshake. On an unclean close the internal socket-close handler calls abort on the writable stream unconditionally and discards the returned promise, but per the WHATWG Streams standard aborting a locked writable returns a promise that rejects with a TypeError. Because the application holds a writer on that writable, which is the only way to write, the rejection is never observed and Node\u0027s default unhandled-rejection behavior terminates the process. An untrusted server can therefore crash a client with a single abrupt disconnect, with no authentication and no application mistake. This affects undici versions from 7.0.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-85014",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-04T20:17:31.027",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.9,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-85014",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-04T19:30:00.595466Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-04T17:17:02.470",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-rx4f-c7p8-82vq"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-248"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-754"
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.