FKIE_CVE-2025-7955

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-08-28 06:15 - Updated: 2025-08-29 16:24
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
The RingCentral Communications plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to improper validation within the ringcentral_admin_login_2fa_verify() function in versions 1.5 to 1.6.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user simply by supplying identical bogus codes.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/rccp-free/tags/1.6.8/ringcentral.php
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3349361/
security@wordfence.comhttps://wordpress.org/plugins/rccp-free/#developers
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0386ed09-296d-4f33-9fe0-964c0c0a9652?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The RingCentral Communications plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to improper validation within the ringcentral_admin_login_2fa_verify() function in versions 1.5 to 1.6.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user simply by supplying identical bogus codes."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento RingCentral Communications para WordPress es vulnerable a la omisi\u00f3n de autenticaci\u00f3n debido a una validaci\u00f3n incorrecta en la funci\u00f3n ringcentral_admin_login_2fa_verify() en las versiones 1.5 a 1.6.8. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados inicien sesi\u00f3n como cualquier usuario simplemente proporcionando c\u00f3digos falsos id\u00e9nticos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-7955",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-29T16:24:09.860",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-08-28T06:15:31.253",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/rccp-free/tags/1.6.8/ringcentral.php"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3349361/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/rccp-free/#developers"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0386ed09-296d-4f33-9fe0-964c0c0a9652?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.