fkie_cve-2025-39886
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-09-23 06:15
Modified
2025-12-12 20:09
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Tell memcg to use allow_spinning=false path in bpf_timer_init() Currently, calling bpf_map_kmalloc_node() from __bpf_async_init() can cause various locking issues; see the following stack trace (edited for style) as one example: ... [10.011566] do_raw_spin_lock.cold [10.011570] try_to_wake_up (5) double-acquiring the same [10.011575] kick_pool rq_lock, causing a hardlockup [10.011579] __queue_work [10.011582] queue_work_on [10.011585] kernfs_notify [10.011589] cgroup_file_notify [10.011593] try_charge_memcg (4) memcg accounting raises an [10.011597] obj_cgroup_charge_pages MEMCG_MAX event [10.011599] obj_cgroup_charge_account [10.011600] __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook [10.011603] __kmalloc_node_noprof ... [10.011611] bpf_map_kmalloc_node [10.011612] __bpf_async_init [10.011615] bpf_timer_init (3) BPF calls bpf_timer_init() [10.011617] bpf_prog_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_fcg_runnable [10.011619] bpf__sched_ext_ops_runnable [10.011620] enqueue_task_scx (2) BPF runs with rq_lock held [10.011622] enqueue_task [10.011626] ttwu_do_activate [10.011629] sched_ttwu_pending (1) grabs rq_lock ... The above was reproduced on bpf-next (b338cf849ec8) by modifying ./tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c to call bpf_timer_init() during ops.runnable(), and hacking the memcg accounting code a bit to make a bpf_timer_init() call more likely to raise an MEMCG_MAX event. We have also run into other similar variants (both internally and on bpf-next), including double-acquiring cgroup_file_kn_lock, the same worker_pool::lock, etc. As suggested by Shakeel, fix this by using __GFP_HIGH instead of GFP_ATOMIC in __bpf_async_init(), so that e.g. if try_charge_memcg() raises an MEMCG_MAX event, we call __memcg_memory_event() with @allow_spinning=false and avoid calling cgroup_file_notify() there. Depends on mm patch "memcg: skip cgroup_file_notify if spinning is not allowed": https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905201606.66198-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/ v0 approach s/bpf_map_kmalloc_node/bpf_mem_alloc/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905061919.439648-1-yepeilin@google.com/ v1 approach: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905234547.862249-1-yepeilin@google.com/
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/449682e76f32601f211816d3e2100bed87e67a4cPatch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d78b4473cdb08b74662355a9e8510bde09c511ePatch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac70cd446f83ccb25532b343919ab86eacdcd06aPatch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd1fd26bb13473c1734e3026b2b97025a0a4087bPatch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel 6.17
linux linux_kernel 6.17
linux linux_kernel 6.17
linux linux_kernel 6.17
linux linux_kernel 6.17


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D779626F-11F0-4684-B8FB-9C4A1E1B2A7A",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.107",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.15",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9652E701-5C8E-49CF-89A5-499E214A5902",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.48",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8DA00A4E-AABB-4A69-AB39-67B22D0B36D2",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.16.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "327D22EF-390B-454C-BD31-2ED23C998A1C",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C730CD9A-D969-4A8E-9522-162AAF7C0EE9",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "39982C4B-716E-4B2F-8196-FA301F47807D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "340BEEA9-D70D-4290-B502-FBB1032353B1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "47E4C5C0-079F-4838-971B-8C503D48FCC2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Tell memcg to use allow_spinning=false path in bpf_timer_init()\n\nCurrently, calling bpf_map_kmalloc_node() from __bpf_async_init() can\ncause various locking issues; see the following stack trace (edited for\nstyle) as one example:\n\n...\n [10.011566]  do_raw_spin_lock.cold\n [10.011570]  try_to_wake_up             (5) double-acquiring the same\n [10.011575]  kick_pool                      rq_lock, causing a hardlockup\n [10.011579]  __queue_work\n [10.011582]  queue_work_on\n [10.011585]  kernfs_notify\n [10.011589]  cgroup_file_notify\n [10.011593]  try_charge_memcg           (4) memcg accounting raises an\n [10.011597]  obj_cgroup_charge_pages        MEMCG_MAX event\n [10.011599]  obj_cgroup_charge_account\n [10.011600]  __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook\n [10.011603]  __kmalloc_node_noprof\n...\n [10.011611]  bpf_map_kmalloc_node\n [10.011612]  __bpf_async_init\n [10.011615]  bpf_timer_init             (3) BPF calls bpf_timer_init()\n [10.011617]  bpf_prog_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_fcg_runnable\n [10.011619]  bpf__sched_ext_ops_runnable\n [10.011620]  enqueue_task_scx           (2) BPF runs with rq_lock held\n [10.011622]  enqueue_task\n [10.011626]  ttwu_do_activate\n [10.011629]  sched_ttwu_pending         (1) grabs rq_lock\n...\n\nThe above was reproduced on bpf-next (b338cf849ec8) by modifying\n./tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c to call bpf_timer_init() during\nops.runnable(), and hacking the memcg accounting code a bit to make\na bpf_timer_init() call more likely to raise an MEMCG_MAX event.\n\nWe have also run into other similar variants (both internally and on\nbpf-next), including double-acquiring cgroup_file_kn_lock, the same\nworker_pool::lock, etc.\n\nAs suggested by Shakeel, fix this by using __GFP_HIGH instead of\nGFP_ATOMIC in __bpf_async_init(), so that e.g. if try_charge_memcg()\nraises an MEMCG_MAX event, we call __memcg_memory_event() with\n@allow_spinning=false and avoid calling cgroup_file_notify() there.\n\nDepends on mm patch\n\"memcg: skip cgroup_file_notify if spinning is not allowed\":\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905201606.66198-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/\n\nv0 approach s/bpf_map_kmalloc_node/bpf_mem_alloc/\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905061919.439648-1-yepeilin@google.com/\nv1 approach:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905234547.862249-1-yepeilin@google.com/"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-39886",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-12T20:09:38.830",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-23T06:15:48.680",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/449682e76f32601f211816d3e2100bed87e67a4c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d78b4473cdb08b74662355a9e8510bde09c511e"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac70cd446f83ccb25532b343919ab86eacdcd06a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd1fd26bb13473c1734e3026b2b97025a0a4087b"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.