fkie_cve-2025-25663
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-20 23:15
Modified
2025-02-21 18:15
Severity ?
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC8V4 V16.03.34.06. Affected is the function SUB_0046AC38 of the file /goform/WifiExtraSet. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto leads to stack-based buffer overflow.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC8V4 V16.03.34.06. Affected is the function SUB_0046AC38 of the file /goform/WifiExtraSet. The manipulation of the argument wpapsk_crypto leads to stack-based buffer overflow." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad en Tenda AC8V4 V16.03.34.06. La funci\u00f3n SUB_0046AC38 del archivo /goform/WifiExtraSet est\u00e1 afectada. La manipulaci\u00f3n del argumento wpapsk_crypto provoca un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer basado en la pila." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-25663", "lastModified": "2025-02-21T18:15:41.693", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-02-20T23:15:12.350", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/jangfan/my-vuln/blob/main/Tenda/AC8V4/WifiExtraSet.md" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-120" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.