fkie_cve-2025-24517
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-03-31 05:15
Modified
2025-04-01 20:26
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
Use of client-side authentication issue exists in CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini (IB-MCT001) all versions. If this issue is exploited, a remote attacker may obtain the product login password without authentication.
References
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttps://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU91154745/
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttps://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-084-04
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttps://www.inaba.co.jp/files/chocomini_vulnerability.pdf
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttps://www.nozominetworks.com/blog/unpatched-vulnerabilities-in-production-line-cameras-may-allow-remote-surveillance-hinder-stoppage-recording
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "Use of client-side authentication issue exists in CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini (IB-MCT001) all versions. If this issue is exploited, a remote attacker may obtain the product login password without authentication.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Existe un problema con la autenticación del lado del cliente en todas las versiones de CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini (IB-MCT001). Si se explota este problema, un atacante remoto podría obtener la contraseña de inicio de sesión del producto sin autenticación.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-24517",
   lastModified: "2025-04-01T20:26:30.593",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 7.5,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-03-31T05:15:15.420",
   references: [
      {
         source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
         url: "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU91154745/",
      },
      {
         source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
         url: "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-084-04",
      },
      {
         source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
         url: "https://www.inaba.co.jp/files/chocomini_vulnerability.pdf",
      },
      {
         source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
         url: "https://www.nozominetworks.com/blog/unpatched-vulnerabilities-in-production-line-cameras-may-allow-remote-surveillance-hinder-stoppage-recording",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-603",
            },
         ],
         source: "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.