fkie_cve-2025-23019
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-14 20:15
Modified
2025-01-29 18:02
Severity ?
5.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling (RFC 4213) allows an attacker to spoof and route traffic via an exposed network interface.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4213Technical Description
cve@mitre.orghttps://papers.mathyvanhoef.com/usenix2025-tunnels.pdfTechnical Description
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.top10vpn.com/research/tunneling-protocol-vulnerability/Technical Description
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ietf ipv6 -


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:ipv6:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9143AE03-F25A-4C4A-9037-DFBC9B4F5FB8",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling (RFC 4213) allows an attacker to spoof and route traffic via an exposed network interface."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La tunelizaci\u00f3n IPv6 en IPv4 (RFC 4213) permite a un atacante falsificar y enrutar el tr\u00e1fico a trav\u00e9s de una interfaz de red expuesta."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-23019",
  "lastModified": "2025-01-29T18:02:06.240",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.4,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "cve@mitre.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-14T20:15:32.577",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Technical Description"
      ],
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4213"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Technical Description"
      ],
      "url": "https://papers.mathyvanhoef.com/usenix2025-tunnels.pdf"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Technical Description"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.top10vpn.com/research/tunneling-protocol-vulnerability/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-940"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.