fkie_cve-2025-22134
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-13 21:15
Modified
2025-01-13 21:15
Severity ?
Summary
When switching to other buffers using the :all command and visual mode still being active, this may cause a heap-buffer overflow, because Vim does not properly end visual mode and therefore may try to access beyond the end of a line in a buffer. In Patch 9.1.1003 Vim will correctly reset the visual mode before opening other windows and buffers and therefore fix this bug. In addition it does verify that it won't try to access a position if the position is greater than the corresponding buffer line. Impact is medium since the user must have switched on visual mode when executing the :all ex command. The Vim project would like to thank github user gandalf4a for reporting this issue. The issue has been fixed as of Vim patch v9.1.1003
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When switching to other buffers using the :all command and visual mode still being active, this may cause a heap-buffer overflow, because Vim does not properly end visual mode and therefore may try to access beyond the end of a line in a buffer. In Patch 9.1.1003 Vim will correctly reset the visual mode before opening other windows and buffers and therefore fix this bug. In addition it does verify that it won\u0027t try to access a position if the position is greater than the corresponding buffer line. Impact is medium since the user must have switched on visual mode when executing the :all ex command. The Vim project would like to thank github user gandalf4a for reporting this issue. The issue has been fixed as of Vim patch v9.1.1003"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Al cambiar a otros buffers usando el comando :all y el modo visual a\u00fan est\u00e1 activo, esto puede causar un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de mont\u00f3n, porque Vim no finaliza correctamente el modo visual y, por lo tanto, puede intentar acceder m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del final de una l\u00ednea en un b\u00fafer. En el parche 9.1.1003, Vim restablecer\u00e1 correctamente el modo visual antes de abrir otras ventanas y b\u00faferes y, por lo tanto, solucionar\u00e1 este error. Adem\u00e1s, verifica que no intentar\u00e1 acceder a una posici\u00f3n si la posici\u00f3n es mayor que la l\u00ednea del b\u00fafer correspondiente. El impacto es medio ya que el usuario debe haber activado el modo visual al ejecutar el comando :all ex. El proyecto Vim desea agradecer al usuario de Github gandalf4a por informar este problema. El problema se ha solucionado a partir del parche de Vim v9.1.1003"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-22134",
"lastModified": "2025-01-13T21:15:14.333",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 0.8,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-01-13T21:15:14.333",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/c9a1e257f1630a0866447e53a564f7ff96a80ead"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/vim/vim/security/advisories/GHSA-5rgf-26wj-48v8"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/11/1"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-122"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.