fkie_cve-2025-21636
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-19 11:15
Modified
2025-01-23 17:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: sysctl: plpmtud_probe_interval: avoid using current->nsproxy
As mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the 'net'
structure via 'current' is not recommended for different reasons:
- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader's/writer's netns vs only
from the opener's netns.
- current->nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an 'Oops'
(null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by
syzbot [1] using acct(2).
The 'net' structure can be obtained from the table->data using
container_of().
Note that table->data could also be used directly, as this is the only
member needed from the 'net' structure, but that would increase the size
of this fix, to use '*data' everywhere 'net->sctp.probe_interval' is
used.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: sysctl: plpmtud_probe_interval: avoid using current-\u003ensproxy\n\nAs mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the \u0027net\u0027\nstructure via \u0027current\u0027 is not recommended for different reasons:\n\n- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader\u0027s/writer\u0027s netns vs only\n from the opener\u0027s netns.\n\n- current-\u003ensproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an \u0027Oops\u0027\n (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by\n syzbot [1] using acct(2).\n\nThe \u0027net\u0027 structure can be obtained from the table-\u003edata using\ncontainer_of().\n\nNote that table-\u003edata could also be used directly, as this is the only\nmember needed from the \u0027net\u0027 structure, but that would increase the size\nof this fix, to use \u0027*data\u0027 everywhere \u0027net-\u003esctp.probe_interval\u0027 is\nused." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: sctp: sysctl: plpmtud_probe_interval: evitar usar current-\u0026gt;nsproxy Como se mencion\u00f3 en un commit anterior de esta serie, no se recomienda usar la estructura \u0027net\u0027 a trav\u00e9s de \u0027current\u0027 por diferentes razones: - Inconsistencia: obtener informaci\u00f3n de los netns del lector/escritor vs solo de los netns del abridor. - current-\u0026gt;nsproxy puede ser NULL en algunos casos, lo que resulta en un \u0027Oops\u0027 (null-ptr-deref), por ejemplo cuando la tarea actual est\u00e1 saliendo, como lo detect\u00f3 syzbot [1] usando acct(2). La estructura \u0027net\u0027 se puede obtener de table-\u0026gt;data usando Container_of(). Tenga en cuenta que table-\u0026gt;data tambi\u00e9n se puede usar directamente, ya que este es el \u00fanico miembro necesario de la estructura \u0027net\u0027, pero eso aumentar\u00eda el tama\u00f1o de esta correcci\u00f3n, para usar \u0027*data\u0027 en todos los lugares donde se use \u0027net-\u0026gt;sctp.probe_interval\u0027." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-21636", "lastModified": "2025-01-23T17:15:24.790", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-01-19T11:15:09.110", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1dc5da6c4178f3e4b95c631418f72de9f86c0449" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/284a221f8fa503628432c7bb5108277c688c6ffa" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44ee8635922b6eb940faddb961a8347c6857d722" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6259d2484d0ceff42245d1f09cc8cb6ee72d847a" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bcf8c60074e81ed2ac2d35130917175a3949c917" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.