fkie_cve-2025-20117
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-26 17:15
Modified
2025-02-26 17:15
Summary
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco APIC could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments that are passed to specific CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted input as the argument of an affected CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of root.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco APIC could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials.\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments that are passed to specific CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted input as the argument of an affected CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of root.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Una vulnerabilidad en la CLI de Cisco APIC podría permitir que un atacante local autenticado ejecute comandos arbitrarios como superusuario en el sistema operativo subyacente de un dispositivo afectado. Para explotar esta vulnerabilidad, el atacante debe tener credenciales administrativas válidas. Esta vulnerabilidad se debe a una validación insuficiente de los argumentos que se pasan a comandos CLI específicos. Un atacante podría explotar esta vulnerabilidad al incluir una entrada manipulada como argumento de un comando CLI afectado. Una explotación exitosa podría permitir que el atacante ejecute comandos arbitrarios en el sistema operativo subyacente con los privilegios de superusuario.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-20117",
   lastModified: "2025-02-26T17:15:22.567",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "LOCAL",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 5.1,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "LOW",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "HIGH",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 0.8,
            impactScore: 4.2,
            source: "psirt@cisco.com",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-02-26T17:15:22.567",
   references: [
      {
         source: "psirt@cisco.com",
         url: "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-apic-multi-vulns-9ummtg5",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "psirt@cisco.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-77",
            },
         ],
         source: "psirt@cisco.com",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.