fkie_cve-2025-20072
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-16 18:15
Modified
2025-01-16 18:15
Severity ?
Summary
Mattermost Mobile versions <= 2.22.0 fail to properly validate the style of proto supplied to an action's style in post.props.attachments, which allows an attacker to crash the mobile via crafted malicious input.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Mattermost Mobile versions \u003c= 2.22.0 fail to properly validate the style of proto supplied to an action\u0027s style in post.props.attachments, which allows an attacker to crash the mobile via crafted malicious input." }, { "lang": "es", "value": " Las versiones de Mattermost Mobile \u0026lt;= 2.22.0 no pueden validar correctamente el estilo del proto suministrado al estilo de una acci\u00f3n en post.props.attachments, lo que permite a un atacante bloquear el m\u00f3vil a trav\u00e9s de una entrada maliciosa manipulada." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-20072", "lastModified": "2025-01-16T18:15:28.517", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "responsibledisclosure@mattermost.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-01-16T18:15:28.517", "references": [ { "source": "responsibledisclosure@mattermost.com", "url": "https://mattermost.com/security-updates" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "responsibledisclosure@mattermost.com", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-704" } ], "source": "responsibledisclosure@mattermost.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.