FKIE_CVE-2025-13428

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-09 16:17 - Updated: 2026-09-30 16:10
Summary
A vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an "IDE role" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise. No customer action is required. All customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
google security_operations_soar *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Google Cloud SecOps SOAR",
          "vendor": "Google Cloud",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.3.64",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:google:security_operations_soar:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7B3CA808-0AE5-45E0-9F1D-BC19E8DD7A89",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.3.64",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an \"IDE role\" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise.\n\nNo customer action is required. \n\n\nAll customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad existe en el servidor SecOps SOAR. La caracter\u00edstica de integraciones personalizadas permiti\u00f3 a un usuario autenticado con un \u0027rol de IDE\u0027 lograr Ejecuci\u00f3n Remota de C\u00f3digo (RCE) en el servidor. La falla se origin\u00f3 de una validaci\u00f3n d\u00e9bil del c\u00f3digo de paquete Python cargado. Un atacante podr\u00eda cargar un paquete que contiene un archivo setup.py malicioso, que se ejecutar\u00eda en el servidor durante el proceso de instalaci\u00f3n, lo que llevar\u00eda a un compromiso potencial del servidor.\n\nNo se requiere ninguna acci\u00f3n del cliente.\n\nTodos los clientes han sido actualizados autom\u00e1ticamente a la versi\u00f3n corregida: 6.3.64 o superior."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-13428",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-30T16:10:00.223",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 8.6,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Clear",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-13428",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-12-09T14:57:32.207726Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-12-09T16:17:35.307",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2025-075"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…