fkie_cve-2024-8403
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 06:15
Modified
2024-11-20 01:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5-ENET versions 1.100 and later and FX5-ENET/IP versions 1.100 to 1.104 allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition in Ethernet communication of the products by sending specially crafted SLMP packets.
References
Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jphttps://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU97790713/
Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jphttps://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-24-324-01
Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jphttps://www.mitsubishielectric.com/en/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2024-009_en.pdf
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5-ENET versions 1.100 and later and FX5-ENET/IP versions 1.100 to 1.104 allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition in Ethernet communication of the products by sending specially crafted SLMP packets.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "La vulnerabilidad de validación incorrecta del tipo de entrada especificado en Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5-ENET versiones 1.100 y posteriores y FX5-ENET/IP versiones 1.100 a 1.104 permite a un atacante remoto provocar una condición de denegación de servicio en la comunicación Ethernet de los productos mediante el envío de paquetes SLMP especialmente manipulados.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-8403",
   lastModified: "2024-11-20T01:15:04.303",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 7.5,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-11-19T06:15:17.873",
   references: [
      {
         source: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
         url: "https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU97790713/",
      },
      {
         source: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
         url: "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-24-324-01",
      },
      {
         source: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
         url: "https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/en/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2024-009_en.pdf",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-1287",
            },
         ],
         source: "Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.