fkie_cve-2024-56612
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-27 15:15
Modified
2025-01-08 16:44
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/gup: handle NULL pages in unpin_user_pages()
The recent addition of "pofs" (pages or folios) handling to gup has a
flaw: it assumes that unpin_user_pages() handles NULL pages in the pages**
array. That's not the case, as I discovered when I ran on a new
configuration on my test machine.
Fix this by skipping NULL pages in unpin_user_pages(), just like
unpin_folios() already does.
Details: when booting on x86 with "numa=fake=2 movablecore=4G" on Linux
6.12, and running this:
tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm
...I get the following crash:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
RIP: 0010:sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body+0x66/0xb0
? page_fault_oops+0x30c/0x3b0
? do_user_addr_fault+0x6c3/0x720
? irqentry_enter+0x34/0x60
? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x100
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0
unpin_user_pages+0x24/0xe0
check_and_migrate_movable_pages_or_folios+0x455/0x4b0
__gup_longterm_locked+0x3bf/0x820
? mmap_read_lock_killable+0x12/0x50
? __pfx_mmap_read_lock_killable+0x10/0x10
pin_user_pages+0x66/0xa0
gup_test_ioctl+0x358/0xb20
__se_sys_ioctl+0x6b/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "2AF25791-E5D9-498F-AEA3-261AE0D30C3C", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.5", "versionStartIncluding": "6.12", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "62567B3C-6CEE-46D0-BC2E-B3717FBF7D13", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/gup: handle NULL pages in unpin_user_pages()\n\nThe recent addition of \"pofs\" (pages or folios) handling to gup has a\nflaw: it assumes that unpin_user_pages() handles NULL pages in the pages**\narray. That\u0027s not the case, as I discovered when I ran on a new\nconfiguration on my test machine.\n\nFix this by skipping NULL pages in unpin_user_pages(), just like\nunpin_folios() already does.\n\nDetails: when booting on x86 with \"numa=fake=2 movablecore=4G\" on Linux\n6.12, and running this:\n\n tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm\n\n...I get the following crash:\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\nRIP: 0010:sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die_body+0x66/0xb0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x30c/0x3b0\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x6c3/0x720\n ? irqentry_enter+0x34/0x60\n ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x100\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0\n unpin_user_pages+0x24/0xe0\n check_and_migrate_movable_pages_or_folios+0x455/0x4b0\n __gup_longterm_locked+0x3bf/0x820\n ? mmap_read_lock_killable+0x12/0x50\n ? __pfx_mmap_read_lock_killable+0x10/0x10\n pin_user_pages+0x66/0xa0\n gup_test_ioctl+0x358/0xb20\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x6b/0xc0\n do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mm/gup: gestionar p\u00e1ginas NULL en unpin_user_pages() La reciente incorporaci\u00f3n dla gesti\u00f3n de \"pofs\" (p\u00e1ginas o folios) a gup tiene un defecto: supone que unpin_user_pages() gestiona p\u00e1ginas NULL en la matriz pages**. Ese no es el caso, como descubr\u00ed cuando ejecut\u00e9 una nueva configuraci\u00f3n en mi m\u00e1quina de prueba. Solucione esto omitiendo las p\u00e1ginas NULL en unpin_user_pages(), tal como ya lo hace unpin_folios(). Detalles: al arrancar en x86 con \"numa=fake=2 movablecore=4G\" en Linux 6.12, y ejecutar esto: tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm ... obtengo el siguiente fallo: ERROR: desreferencia de puntero NULL del n\u00facleo, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000008 RIP: 0010:sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x3a/0x2d0 ... Seguimiento de llamadas: ? __die_body+0x66/0xb0 ? page_fault_oops+0x30c/0x3b0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x6c3/0x720 ? irqentry_enter+0x34/0x60 ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x100 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? comprobaci\u00f3n de integridad de p\u00e1ginas fijadas+0x3a/0x2d0 desanclar p\u00e1ginas de usuario+0x24/0xe0 comprobar y migrar p\u00e1ginas o folios movibles+0x455/0x4b0 __gup_longterm_locked+0x3bf/0x820 ? mmap_read_lock_killable+0x12/0x50 ? __pfx_mmap_read_lock_killable+0x10/0x10 pin_usuario_p\u00e1ginas+0x66/0xa0 gup_test_ioctl+0x358/0xb20 __se_sys_ioctl+0x6b/0xc0 hacer_llamada_al_sistema_64+0x7b/0x150 entrada_SYSCALL_64_despu\u00e9s_de_hwframe+0x76/0x7e" } ], "id": "CVE-2024-56612", "lastModified": "2025-01-08T16:44:20.777", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-12-27T15:15:20.687", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69d319450d1c651f3b05cd820ff285fdd810c032" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1268be280d8e484ab3606d7476edd0f14bb9961" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.