fkie_cve-2024-56584
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-27 15:15
Modified
2024-12-27 15:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/tctx: work around xa_store() allocation error issue syzbot triggered the following WARN_ON: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at io_uring/tctx.c:51 __io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51 which is the WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(&tctx->xa)); sanity check in __io_uring_free() when a io_uring_task is going through its final put. The syzbot test case includes injecting memory allocation failures, and it very much looks like xa_store() can fail one of its memory allocations and end up with ->head being non-NULL even though no entries exist in the xarray. Until this issue gets sorted out, work around it by attempting to iterate entries in our xarray, and WARN_ON_ONCE() if one is found.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nio_uring/tctx: work around xa_store() allocation error issue\n\nsyzbot triggered the following WARN_ON:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at io_uring/tctx.c:51 __io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51\n\nwhich is the\n\nWARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(\u0026tctx-\u003exa));\n\nsanity check in __io_uring_free() when a io_uring_task is going through\nits final put. The syzbot test case includes injecting memory allocation\nfailures, and it very much looks like xa_store() can fail one of its\nmemory allocations and end up with -\u003ehead being non-NULL even though no\nentries exist in the xarray.\n\nUntil this issue gets sorted out, work around it by attempting to\niterate entries in our xarray, and WARN_ON_ONCE() if one is found."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: io_uring/tctx: workaround al problema de error de asignaci\u00f3n de xa_store() syzbot activ\u00f3 el siguiente WARN_ON: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 en io_uring/tctx.c:51 __io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51 que es la comprobaci\u00f3n de cordura WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(\u0026amp;tctx-\u0026gt;xa)); en __io_uring_free() cuando una io_uring_task est\u00e1 pasando por su put final. El caso de prueba de syzbot incluye la inyecci\u00f3n de fallos de asignaci\u00f3n de memoria, y parece que xa_store() puede fallar en una de sus asignaciones de memoria y terminar con -\u0026gt;head siendo distinto de NULL aunque no existan entradas en la matriz x. Hasta que se resuelva este problema, puede solucionarlo intentando iterar las entradas en nuestra matriz x y usar WARN_ON_ONCE() si encuentra alguna."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-56584",
  "lastModified": "2024-12-27T15:15:17.567",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2024-12-27T15:15:17.567",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42882b583095dcf747da6e3af1daeff40e27033e"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7eb75ce7527129d7f1fee6951566af409a37a1c4"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94ad56f61b873ffeebcc620d451eacfbdf9d40f0"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5b2ddf1f90c7248eff9630b95895c8950f2f36d"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.