fkie_cve-2024-53047
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 18:15
Modified
2024-11-27 20:28
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock
Enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT
creates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by mptcp_connect/176.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+ #11
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)
mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7))
mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1))
? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28)
inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386)
? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1))
__sock_create (net/socket.c:1576)
__sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671)
? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712)
? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1))
__x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1))
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
That's because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not
used despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of
mptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids the
warning.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "D65DC921-1258-459B-AC56-13B03E48CA9C", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.60", "versionStartIncluding": "6.6", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E96F53A4-5E87-4A70-BD9A-BC327828D57F", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.7", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock\n\nEnabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT\ncreates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created:\n\n =============================\n WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted\n -----------------------------\n net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n\n rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n no locks held by mptcp_connect/176.\n\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+ #11\n Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)\n mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7))\n mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1))\n ? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28)\n inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386)\n ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1))\n __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576)\n __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671)\n ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712)\n ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1))\n __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728)\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1))\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n\nThat\u0027s because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not\nused despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of\nmptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids the\nwarning." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mptcp: init: proteger sched con rcu_read_lock Habilitar CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST con su dependencia CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT crea este splat cuando se crea un socket MPTCP: ============================= ADVERTENCIA: uso sospechoso de RCU 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 No contaminado ----------------------------- net/mptcp/sched.c:44 \u00a1Lista de RCU recorrida en una secci\u00f3n que no es de lectura! Otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no hay bloqueos retenidos por mptcp_connect/176. seguimiento de pila: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect No contaminado 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Nombre del hardware: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Seguimiento de llamadas: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822) mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminador 7)) mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminador 1)) ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminador 1)) __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576) __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671) ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712) ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1)) __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) Esto se debe a que cuando se inicializa el socket, no se utiliza rcu_read_lock() a pesar del comentario expl\u00edcito escrito encima de la declaraci\u00f3n de mptcp_sched_find() en sched.c. Agregar el bloqueo/desbloqueo faltante evita la advertencia." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-53047", "lastModified": "2024-11-27T20:28:03.473", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-11-19T18:15:25.060", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3deb12c788c385e17142ce6ec50f769852fcec65" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/494eb22f9a7bd03783e60595a57611c209175f1a" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb8b81ad3e893a6d18dcdd3754cc2ea2a42c0136" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-667" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.