fkie_cve-2024-50304
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 18:15
Modified
2025-02-02 11:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: ip_tunnel: Fix suspicious RCU usage warning in ip_tunnel_find()
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and
ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is
taken.
Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in
ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to
silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1].
[1]
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by ip/362:
#0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60
stack backtrace:
CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110
lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6
ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0
ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0
ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170
__rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0
rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60
netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450
netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0
netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80
____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20
___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0
__sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0
do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "71D5AD44-225A-4EFC-B47D-2C5EFE16D98B", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.7", "versionStartIncluding": "3.10.12", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv4: ip_tunnel: Fix suspicious RCU usage warning in ip_tunnel_find()\n\nThe per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and\nip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is\ntaken.\n\nAdd a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in\nip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to\nsilence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1].\n\n[1]\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Not tainted\n-----------------------------\nnet/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n1 lock held by ip/362:\n #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60\n\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139\nHardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6\n ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0\n ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0\n ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170\n __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0\n rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450\n netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0\n netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0\n __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0\n do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ipv4: ip_tunnel: Se corrige la advertencia de uso sospechoso de RCU en ip_tunnel_find() La tabla hash del t\u00fanel IP por netns est\u00e1 protegida por el mutex RTNL y ip_tunnel_find() solo se llama desde la ruta de control donde se toma el mutex. Agregue una expresi\u00f3n lockdep a hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() en ip_tunnel_find() para validar que se mantiene el mutex y silenciar la advertencia de uso sospechoso de RCU [1]. [1] ADVERTENCIA: uso sospechoso de RCU 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 No contaminado ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 \u00a1Lista de RCU recorrida en la secci\u00f3n que no es de lectura! Otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 bloqueo retenido por ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 seguimiento de pila: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip No contaminado 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Nombre del hardware: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Seguimiento de llamadas: dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 hacer_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entrada_SYSCALL_64_despu\u00e9s_hwframe+0x77/0x7f" } ], "id": "CVE-2024-50304", "lastModified": "2025-02-02T11:15:11.207", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-11-19T18:15:22.343", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31bd7378c6fe100a8af0e996ea0b5dafd3579df6" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac5dfa575136da8dd8a9e7c1437c41f3a593993" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90e0569dd3d32f4f4d2ca691d3fa5a8a14a13c12" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce11424026cbf87d5861b09e5e33565ff7f2ec8d" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0500e4373cd3d5eace1f1712444ab830b82c114" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f20fe2cfe06ca1b008b09da4f2b4e0c5547ccef6" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.