fkie_cve-2024-50304
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 18:15
Modified
2025-02-02 11:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: ip_tunnel: Fix suspicious RCU usage warning in ip_tunnel_find()
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and
ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is
taken.
Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in
ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to
silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1].
[1]
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by ip/362:
#0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60
stack backtrace:
CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110
lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6
ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0
ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0
ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170
__rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0
rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60
netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450
netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0
netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80
____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20
___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0
__sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0
do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "71D5AD44-225A-4EFC-B47D-2C5EFE16D98B", versionEndExcluding: "6.11.7", versionStartIncluding: "3.10.12", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv4: ip_tunnel: Fix suspicious RCU usage warning in ip_tunnel_find()\n\nThe per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and\nip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is\ntaken.\n\nAdd a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in\nip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to\nsilence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1].\n\n[1]\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Not tainted\n-----------------------------\nnet/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n1 lock held by ip/362:\n #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60\n\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139\nHardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6\n ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0\n ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0\n ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170\n __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0\n rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450\n netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0\n netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0\n __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0\n do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ipv4: ip_tunnel: Se corrige la advertencia de uso sospechoso de RCU en ip_tunnel_find() La tabla hash del túnel IP por netns está protegida por el mutex RTNL y ip_tunnel_find() solo se llama desde la ruta de control donde se toma el mutex. Agregue una expresión lockdep a hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() en ip_tunnel_find() para validar que se mantiene el mutex y silenciar la advertencia de uso sospechoso de RCU [1]. [1] ADVERTENCIA: uso sospechoso de RCU 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 No contaminado ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 ¡Lista de RCU recorrida en la sección que no es de lectura! Otra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 bloqueo retenido por ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 seguimiento de pila: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip No contaminado 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb #139 Nombre del hardware: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Seguimiento de llamadas: dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 hacer_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entrada_SYSCALL_64_después_hwframe+0x77/0x7f", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-50304", lastModified: "2025-02-02T11:15:11.207", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 5.5, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2024-11-19T18:15:22.343", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31bd7378c6fe100a8af0e996ea0b5dafd3579df6", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac5dfa575136da8dd8a9e7c1437c41f3a593993", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90e0569dd3d32f4f4d2ca691d3fa5a8a14a13c12", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce11424026cbf87d5861b09e5e33565ff7f2ec8d", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0500e4373cd3d5eace1f1712444ab830b82c114", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f20fe2cfe06ca1b008b09da4f2b4e0c5547ccef6", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.