fkie_cve-2024-50265
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 02:16
Modified
2024-11-21 19:28
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove() Syzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove(): [ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12 [ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry [ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004 [...] [ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [...] [ 57.331328] Call Trace: [ 57.331477] <TASK> [...] [ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740 [ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 [ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10 [ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0 [ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0 [ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 [ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20 [ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70 [ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40 [ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0 [ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0 [ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290 [ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0 [ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0 [ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0 [ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190 [ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100 [...] Reproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() -> ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM. In this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry anyway. But the following 'rc' check is wrong and execution flow do 'ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);' twice: * 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(); * 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to 'out'. Fix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making syzkaller repro happy.



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "EC743DF1-1998-4233-B6BA-1299888DEAEA",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.19.324",
              "versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9952C897-8A61-4D4B-9D6D-7D063E9EA15E",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.4.286",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "BF5B32D0-72C9-41C3-A0BB-D4946153C134",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "88812664-4296-42AC-AE0F-ED71086C1BB1",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0DD7F755-2F6B-4707-8973-78496AD5AA8E",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "630ED7EB-C97E-4435-B884-1E309E40D6F3",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0BD000F7-3DAD-4DD3-8906-98EA1EC67E95",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove()\n\nSyzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove():\n\n[   57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12\n[   57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper.  Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry\n[   57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004\n[...]\n[   57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0\n[...]\n[   57.331328] Call Trace:\n[   57.331477]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[...]\n[   57.333511]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740\n[   57.333778]  ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170\n[   57.334016]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30\n[   57.334263]  ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10\n[   57.334596]  ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0\n[   57.334913]  ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0\n[   57.335164]  ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0\n[   57.335381]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40\n[   57.335620]  ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20\n[   57.335915]  ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70\n[   57.336153]  ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500\n[   57.336410]  ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80\n[   57.336656]  ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40\n[   57.336906]  ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500\n[   57.337162]  ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0\n[   57.337424]  __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0\n[   57.337706]  ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290\n[   57.337971]  ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0\n[   57.338207]  ? dput+0x46/0x1c0\n[   57.338393]  ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30\n[   57.338665]  ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30\n[   57.338948]  __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0\n[   57.339182]  __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190\n[   57.339456]  ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80\n[   57.339705]  vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100\n[...]\n\nReproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() -\u003e\nocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM.\n\nIn this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if\nocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry\nanyway. But the following \u0027rc\u0027 check is wrong and execution flow do\n\u0027ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);\u0027 twice:\n* 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate();\n* 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to \u0027out\u0027.\n\nFix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making\nsyzkaller repro happy."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ocfs2: eliminar la entrada una vez en lugar de la desreferencia ptr nula en ocfs2_xa_remove() Syzkaller puede provocar la desreferencia ptr nula en ocfs2_xa_remove(): [ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12 [ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Truncamiento parcial al eliminar xattr overlay.upper. Fuga de 1 cl\u00faster y eliminaci\u00f3n de la entrada [ 57.321727] ERROR: desreferencia de puntero NULL del n\u00facleo, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000004 [...] [ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [...] [ 57.331328] Seguimiento de llamadas: [ 57.331477]  [...] [ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740 [ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 [ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10 [ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0 [ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0 [ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 [ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20 [ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70 [ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40 [ 57.336906] ? ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0 [ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290 [ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0 [ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0 [ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0 [ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190 [ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100 [...] El reproductor utiliza la funci\u00f3n faultinject para hacer que ocfs2_xa_remove() -\u0026gt; ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() falle con -ENOMEM. En este caso, el comentario menciona que podemos devolver 0 si ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() va a borrar la entrada de todos modos. Pero la siguiente comprobaci\u00f3n de \u0027rc\u0027 es incorrecta y el flujo de ejecuci\u00f3n ejecuta \u0027ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);\u0027 dos veces: * 1.\u00aa: en ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(); * 2.\u00aa: regresa a ocfs2_xa_remove() en lugar de ir a \u0027out\u0027. Solucione esto omitiendo la segunda eliminaci\u00f3n de la misma entrada y haciendo que syzkaller repro funcione correctamente."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-50265",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T19:28:00.687",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-11-19T02:16:28.310",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b63c0e01fba40e3992bc627272ec7b618ccaef7"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/168a9b8303fcb0317db4c06b23ce1c0ce2af4e10"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b5369528ee63c88371816178a05b5e664c87386"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38cbf13b2e7a31362babe411f7c2c3c52cd2734b"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a7e6dcf90fe7721d0863067b6ca9a9442134692"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86dd0e8d42828923c68ad506933336bcd6f2317d"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc8fe8c83145041cb6c80cac21f6173a3ff0204"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd73c942eed76a014c7a5597e6926435274d2c4c"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-476"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.