fkie_cve-2024-50265
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-19 02:16
Modified
2024-11-21 19:28
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove()
Syzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove():
[ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12
[ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry
[ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004
[...]
[ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0
[...]
[ 57.331328] Call Trace:
[ 57.331477] <TASK>
[...]
[ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740
[ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170
[ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30
[ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10
[ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0
[ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0
[ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0
[ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40
[ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20
[ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70
[ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500
[ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80
[ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40
[ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500
[ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0
[ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0
[ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290
[ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0
[ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0
[ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30
[ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30
[ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0
[ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190
[ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80
[ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100
[...]
Reproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() ->
ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM.
In this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if
ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry
anyway. But the following 'rc' check is wrong and execution flow do
'ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);' twice:
* 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate();
* 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to 'out'.
Fix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making
syzkaller repro happy.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "EC743DF1-1998-4233-B6BA-1299888DEAEA", "versionEndExcluding": "4.19.324", "versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "9952C897-8A61-4D4B-9D6D-7D063E9EA15E", "versionEndExcluding": "5.4.286", "versionStartIncluding": "4.20", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "BF5B32D0-72C9-41C3-A0BB-D4946153C134", "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230", "versionStartIncluding": "5.5", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "88812664-4296-42AC-AE0F-ED71086C1BB1", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172", "versionStartIncluding": "5.11", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "0DD7F755-2F6B-4707-8973-78496AD5AA8E", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "630ED7EB-C97E-4435-B884-1E309E40D6F3", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "0BD000F7-3DAD-4DD3-8906-98EA1EC67E95", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove()\n\nSyzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove():\n\n[ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12\n[ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry\n[ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004\n[...]\n[ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0\n[...]\n[ 57.331328] Call Trace:\n[ 57.331477] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[...]\n[ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740\n[ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170\n[ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30\n[ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10\n[ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0\n[ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0\n[ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0\n[ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40\n[ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20\n[ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70\n[ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500\n[ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80\n[ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40\n[ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500\n[ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0\n[ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0\n[ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290\n[ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0\n[ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0\n[ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30\n[ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30\n[ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0\n[ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190\n[ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80\n[ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100\n[...]\n\nReproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() -\u003e\nocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM.\n\nIn this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if\nocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry\nanyway. But the following \u0027rc\u0027 check is wrong and execution flow do\n\u0027ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);\u0027 twice:\n* 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate();\n* 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to \u0027out\u0027.\n\nFix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making\nsyzkaller repro happy." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ocfs2: eliminar la entrada una vez en lugar de la desreferencia ptr nula en ocfs2_xa_remove() Syzkaller puede provocar la desreferencia ptr nula en ocfs2_xa_remove(): [ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12 [ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Truncamiento parcial al eliminar xattr overlay.upper. Fuga de 1 cl\u00faster y eliminaci\u00f3n de la entrada [ 57.321727] ERROR: desreferencia de puntero NULL del n\u00facleo, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000004 [...] [ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [...] [ 57.331328] Seguimiento de llamadas: [ 57.331477] [...] [ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740 [ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30 [ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10 [ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0 [ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0 [ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0 [ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 [ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20 [ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70 [ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500 [ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40 [ 57.336906] ? ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0 [ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290 [ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0 [ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0 [ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30 [ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0 [ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190 [ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80 [ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100 [...] El reproductor utiliza la funci\u00f3n faultinject para hacer que ocfs2_xa_remove() -\u0026gt; ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() falle con -ENOMEM. En este caso, el comentario menciona que podemos devolver 0 si ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() va a borrar la entrada de todos modos. Pero la siguiente comprobaci\u00f3n de \u0027rc\u0027 es incorrecta y el flujo de ejecuci\u00f3n ejecuta \u0027ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);\u0027 dos veces: * 1.\u00aa: en ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(); * 2.\u00aa: regresa a ocfs2_xa_remove() en lugar de ir a \u0027out\u0027. Solucione esto omitiendo la segunda eliminaci\u00f3n de la misma entrada y haciendo que syzkaller repro funcione correctamente." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-50265", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T19:28:00.687", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-11-19T02:16:28.310", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b63c0e01fba40e3992bc627272ec7b618ccaef7" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/168a9b8303fcb0317db4c06b23ce1c0ce2af4e10" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b5369528ee63c88371816178a05b5e664c87386" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38cbf13b2e7a31362babe411f7c2c3c52cd2734b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a7e6dcf90fe7721d0863067b6ca9a9442134692" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86dd0e8d42828923c68ad506933336bcd6f2317d" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc8fe8c83145041cb6c80cac21f6173a3ff0204" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd73c942eed76a014c7a5597e6926435274d2c4c" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.