fkie_cve-2024-50058
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-21 20:15
Modified
2024-11-08 16:15
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: protect uart_port_dtr_rts() in uart_shutdown() too Commit af224ca2df29 (serial: core: Prevent unsafe uart port access, part 3) added few uport == NULL checks. It added one to uart_shutdown(), so the commit assumes, uport can be NULL in there. But right after that protection, there is an unprotected "uart_port_dtr_rts(uport, false);" call. That is invoked only if HUPCL is set, so I assume that is the reason why we do not see lots of these reports. Or it cannot be NULL at this point at all for some reason :P. Until the above is investigated, stay on the safe side and move this dereference to the if too. I got this inconsistency from Coverity under CID 1585130. Thanks.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *



{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "D50B3F37-2EA9-4348-B50C-34DCAAF2076E",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.6.57",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "AA84D336-CE9A-4535-B901-1AD77EC17C34",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.11.4",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.7",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nserial: protect uart_port_dtr_rts() in uart_shutdown() too\n\nCommit af224ca2df29 (serial: core: Prevent unsafe uart port access, part\n3) added few uport == NULL checks. It added one to uart_shutdown(), so\nthe commit assumes, uport can be NULL in there. But right after that\nprotection, there is an unprotected \"uart_port_dtr_rts(uport, false);\"\ncall. That is invoked only if HUPCL is set, so I assume that is the\nreason why we do not see lots of these reports.\n\nOr it cannot be NULL at this point at all for some reason :P.\n\nUntil the above is investigated, stay on the safe side and move this\ndereference to the if too.\n\nI got this inconsistency from Coverity under CID 1585130. Thanks.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: serial: proteger uart_port_dtr_rts() en uart_shutdown() también El commit af224ca2df29 (serial: core: Prevenir el acceso inseguro al puerto uart, parte 3) agregó algunas comprobaciones uport == NULL. Agregó una a uart_shutdown(), por lo que el commit asume que uport puede ser NULL allí. Pero justo después de esa protección, hay una llamada \"uart_port_dtr_rts(uport, false);\" sin protección. Eso se invoca solo si HUPCL está configurado, por lo que supongo que esa es la razón por la que no vemos muchos de estos informes. O no puede ser NULL en este punto en absoluto por alguna razón :P. Hasta que se investigue lo anterior, manténgase del lado seguro y mueva esta desreferencia al if también. Obtuve esta inconsistencia de Coverity bajo CID 1585130. Gracias.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-50058",
   lastModified: "2024-11-08T16:15:45.117",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "LOCAL",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 5.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 1.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-10-21T20:15:17.993",
   references: [
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fe399bb8efd0d325ab1138cf8e3ecf23a39e96d",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/399927f0f875b93f3d5a0336d382ba48b8671eb2",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/602babaa84d627923713acaf5f7e9a4369e77473",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76ed24a34223bb2c6b6162e1d8389ec4e602a290",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7b5876a6e74cdf8468a478be6b23f2f5464ac7a",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e418d91195d29d5f9c9685ff309b92b04b41dc40",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-476",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.