fkie_cve-2024-50038
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-21 20:15
Modified
2024-10-25 15:45
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed
syzbot managed to call xt_cluster match via ebtables:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:72 xt_cluster_mt+0x196/0x780
[..]
ebt_do_table+0x174b/0x2a40
Module registers to NFPROTO_UNSPEC, but it assumes ipv4/ipv6 packet
processing. As this is only useful to restrict locally terminating
TCP/UDP traffic, register this for ipv4 and ipv6 family only.
Pablo points out that this is a general issue, direct users of the
set/getsockopt interface can call into targets/matches that were only
intended for use with ip(6)tables.
Check all UNSPEC matches and targets for similar issues:
- matches and targets are fine except if they assume skb_network_header()
is valid -- this is only true when called from inet layer: ip(6) stack
pulls the ip/ipv6 header into linear data area.
- targets that return XT_CONTINUE or other xtables verdicts must be
restricted too, they are incompatbile with the ebtables traverser, e.g.
EBT_CONTINUE is a completely different value than XT_CONTINUE.
Most matches/targets are changed to register for NFPROTO_IPV4/IPV6, as
they are provided for use by ip(6)tables.
The MARK target is also used by arptables, so register for NFPROTO_ARP too.
While at it, bail out if connbytes fails to enable the corresponding
conntrack family.
This change passes the selftests in iptables.git.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "B7B7108B-7220-433F-A168-6ECF9D7F65F3", versionEndExcluding: "5.15.168", versionStartIncluding: "2.6.30", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "D01BD22E-ACD1-4618-9D01-6116570BE1EE", versionEndExcluding: "6.1.113", versionStartIncluding: "5.16", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "05D83DB8-7465-4F88-AFB2-980011992AC1", versionEndExcluding: "6.6.57", versionStartIncluding: "6.2", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "AA84D336-CE9A-4535-B901-1AD77EC17C34", versionEndExcluding: "6.11.4", versionStartIncluding: "6.7", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed\n\nsyzbot managed to call xt_cluster match via ebtables:\n\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:72 xt_cluster_mt+0x196/0x780\n [..]\n ebt_do_table+0x174b/0x2a40\n\nModule registers to NFPROTO_UNSPEC, but it assumes ipv4/ipv6 packet\nprocessing. As this is only useful to restrict locally terminating\nTCP/UDP traffic, register this for ipv4 and ipv6 family only.\n\nPablo points out that this is a general issue, direct users of the\nset/getsockopt interface can call into targets/matches that were only\nintended for use with ip(6)tables.\n\nCheck all UNSPEC matches and targets for similar issues:\n\n- matches and targets are fine except if they assume skb_network_header()\n is valid -- this is only true when called from inet layer: ip(6) stack\n pulls the ip/ipv6 header into linear data area.\n- targets that return XT_CONTINUE or other xtables verdicts must be\n restricted too, they are incompatbile with the ebtables traverser, e.g.\n EBT_CONTINUE is a completely different value than XT_CONTINUE.\n\nMost matches/targets are changed to register for NFPROTO_IPV4/IPV6, as\nthey are provided for use by ip(6)tables.\n\nThe MARK target is also used by arptables, so register for NFPROTO_ARP too.\n\nWhile at it, bail out if connbytes fails to enable the corresponding\nconntrack family.\n\nThis change passes the selftests in iptables.git.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: netfilter: xtables: evita NFPROTO_UNSPEC donde sea necesario syzbot logró llamar a xt_cluster match a través de ebtables: ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 11 en net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:72 xt_cluster_mt+0x196/0x780 [..] ebt_do_table+0x174b/0x2a40 El módulo se registra en NFPROTO_UNSPEC, pero asume el procesamiento de paquetes ipv4/ipv6. Como esto solo es útil para restringir el tráfico TCP/UDP que termina localmente, regístrelo solo para la familia ipv4 e ipv6. Pablo señala que este es un problema general, los usuarios directos de la interfaz set/getsockopt pueden llamar a destinos/coincidencias que solo estaban destinados a usarse con tablas ip(6). Compruebe todas las coincidencias y objetivos UNSPEC para ver si hay problemas similares: - las coincidencias y los objetivos están bien excepto si asumen que skb_network_header() es válido - esto solo es cierto cuando se llama desde la capa inet: la pila ip(6) extrae el encabezado ip/ipv6 en el área de datos lineales. - los objetivos que devuelven XT_CONTINUE u otros veredictos de xtables también deben restringirse, son incompatibles con el traverser de ebtables, por ejemplo, EBT_CONTINUE es un valor completamente diferente de XT_CONTINUE. La mayoría de las coincidencias/objetivos se cambian para registrarse para NFPROTO_IPV4/IPV6, ya que se proporcionan para su uso por ip(6)tables. El objetivo MARK también lo usan arptables, así que regístrese también para NFPROTO_ARP. Mientras tanto, abandone si connbytes no puede habilitar la familia conntrack correspondiente. Este cambio pasa las autopruebas en iptables.git.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-50038", lastModified: "2024-10-25T15:45:51.340", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 5.5, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2024-10-21T20:15:16.877", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0bfcb7b71e735560077a42847f69597ec7dcc326", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cdc55ec6222bb195995cc58f7cb46e4d8907056", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85ff9a0f793ca52c527e75cd40a69c948627ebde", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f482bb7e27b37f1f734bb9a8eeb28b23d59d189", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/997f67d813ce0cf5eb3cdb8f124da68141e91b6c", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Analyzed", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.