fkie_cve-2024-50014
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-21 19:15
Modified
2025-02-02 11:15
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "652638C5-5F25-4DF3-AD42-DD3252A97152",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.10.14",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "54D9C704-D679-41A7-9C40-10A6B1E7FFE9",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.3",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.11",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path\n\nThe following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when\nexecuted against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled:\n\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn\u0027t initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90\n register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0\n __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630\n ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380\n lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0\n ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160\n _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40\n ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160\n __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160\n ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0\n __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270\n ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450\n ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450\n ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540\n ? jread+0x88/0x2e0\n ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40\n do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00\n jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0\n jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390\n ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40\n ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180\n...\n\nIn the replay path there\u0027s an attempt to lock sbi-\u003es_bdev_wb_lock in\nfunction ext4_check_bdev_write_error().  Unfortunately, at this point this\nspinlock has not been initialized yet.  Moving it\u0027s initialization to an\nearlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ext4: se corrige el acceso a un bloqueo no inicializado en la ruta de reproducci\u00f3n de fc El siguiente seguimiento del kernel se puede activar con fstest generic/629 cuando se ejecuta contra un sistema de archivos con la funci\u00f3n de confirmaci\u00f3n r\u00e1pida habilitada: INFO: intentando registrar una clave no est\u00e1tica. El c\u00f3digo est\u00e1 bien, pero necesita la anotaci\u00f3n lockdep, o tal vez no inicializ\u00f3 este objeto antes de usarlo. Desactivando el validador de correcci\u00f3n de bloqueo. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: montaje No contaminado 6.10.0+ #11 Nombre del hardware: PC est\u00e1ndar QEMU (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 01/04/2014 Seguimiento de llamadas:  dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... En la ruta de reproducci\u00f3n hay un intento de bloquear sbi-\u0026gt;s_bdev_wb_lock en la funci\u00f3n ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Desafortunadamente, en este punto este spinlock a\u00fan no se ha inicializado. Mover su inicializaci\u00f3n a un punto anterior en __ext4_fill_super() corrige este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-50014",
  "lastModified": "2025-02-02T11:15:10.603",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-10-21T19:15:04.830",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13ea9547763a0488a90ff37cdf52ec85e36ea344"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23dfdb56581ad92a9967bcd720c8c23356af74c1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e35f560daebe40264c95e9a1ab03110d4997df6"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b002031d585a14eed511117dda8c6452a804d508"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d157fc20ca5239fd56965a5a8aa1a0e25919891a"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-908"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.