fkie_cve-2024-49868
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-21 18:15
Modified
2024-11-08 16:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion
[BUG]
Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash:
FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676
prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642
relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678
...
BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667]
RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926
Call Trace:
<TASK>
commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430
del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline]
reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742
btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[CAUSE]
The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside
prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call
unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info->balance_ctl to be NULL.
Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling
reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete
the balance item in the root tree.
However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and
unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a
reloc_root for that subvolume.
Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of
del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside
commit_fs_roots().
That function checks if fs_info->reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree
stage, but since fs_info->reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer
dereference.
[FIX]
Just add extra check on fs_info->reloc_ctl inside
btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking
fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree.
That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the
reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all,
we do not need to bother that.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "EB525A44-6338-4857-AD90-EA2860D1AD1F", "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.227", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "4D51C05D-455B-4D8D-89E7-A58E140B864C", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.168", "versionStartIncluding": "5.11", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "D01BD22E-ACD1-4618-9D01-6116570BE1EE", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.113", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E90B9576-56C4-47BC-AAB0-C5B2D438F5D0", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.55", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "4C16BCE0-FFA0-4599-BE0A-1FD65101C021", "versionEndExcluding": "6.10.14", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "54D9C704-D679-41A7-9C40-10A6B1E7FFE9", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.3", "versionStartIncluding": "6.11", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion\n\n[BUG]\nSyzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash:\n\n FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.\n start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676\n prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642\n relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678\n ...\n BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667]\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496\n btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430\n del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline]\n reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742\n btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574\n btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\n[CAUSE]\nThe allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside\nprepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call\nunset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info-\u003ebalance_ctl to be NULL.\n\nThen we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling\nreset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete\nthe balance item in the root tree.\n\nHowever during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and\nunset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a\nreloc_root for that subvolume.\n\nThen we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of\ndel_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside\ncommit_fs_roots().\n\nThat function checks if fs_info-\u003ereloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree\nstage, but since fs_info-\u003ereloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer\ndereference.\n\n[FIX]\nJust add extra check on fs_info-\u003ereloc_ctl inside\nbtrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking\nfs_info-\u003ereloc_ctl-\u003emerge_reloc_tree.\n\nThat DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the\nreloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all,\nwe do not need to bother that." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: btrfs: corrige una desreferencia de puntero NULL cuando no se puede iniciar una nueva transacci\u00f3n [ERROR] Syzbot inform\u00f3 una desreferencia de puntero NULL con el siguiente bloqueo: FAULT_INJECTION: forzando un fallo. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... Informaci\u00f3n de BTRFS (dispositivo loop0): balance: finalizado con estado: -12 Vaya: error de protecci\u00f3n general, probablemente para la direcci\u00f3n no can\u00f3nica 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref en el rango [0x000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Seguimiento de llamadas: commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [en l\u00ednea] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSA] El fallo de asignaci\u00f3n ocurre en start_transaction() dentro de prepare_to_relocate(), y durante el manejo de errores llamamos a unset_reloc_control(), lo que hace que fs_info-\u0026gt;balance_ctl sea NULL. Luego continuamos con la limpieza de la ruta de error en btrfs_balance() llamando a reset_balance_state() que llamar\u00e1 a del_balance_item() para eliminar por completo el elemento de balance en el \u00e1rbol ra\u00edz. Sin embargo, durante la peque\u00f1a ventana entre set_reloc_contrl() y unset_reloc_control(), podemos tener una actualizaci\u00f3n del \u00e1rbol de subvolumen y crear un reloc_root para ese subvolumen. Luego pasamos a la btrfs_commit_transaction() final de del_balance_item() y a btrfs_update_reloc_root() dentro de commit_fs_roots(). Esa funci\u00f3n verifica si fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl est\u00e1 en la etapa merge_reloc_tree, pero dado que fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl es NULL, da como resultado una desreferencia de puntero NULL. [SOLUCI\u00d3N] Solo hay que a\u00f1adir una comprobaci\u00f3n adicional en fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl dentro de btrfs_update_reloc_root(), antes de comprobar fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl-\u0026gt;merge_reloc_tree. El manejo de DEAD_RELOC_TREE sirve para evitar modificaciones adicionales del \u00e1rbol de reubicaci\u00f3n durante la etapa de fusi\u00f3n, pero como no hay ning\u00fan reloc_ctl, no tenemos que preocuparnos por eso." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-49868", "lastModified": "2024-11-08T16:15:29.227", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-10-21T18:15:06.623", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1282f001cbf56e5dd6e90a18e205a566793f4be0" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37fee9c220b92c3b7bf22b51c51dde5364e7590b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39356ec0e319ed07627b3a0f402d0608546509e6" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ad0c5868f2f0418619089513d95230c66cb7eb4" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3b47f49e83197e8dffd023ec568403bcdbb774b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d13249c0df7aab885acb149695f82c54c0822a70" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d73d48acf36f57362df7e4f9d76568168bf5e944" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc02c1440705e3451abd1c2c8114a5c1bb188e9f" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.