fkie_cve-2024-47175
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-09-26 22:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:39
Severity ?
Summary
CUPS is a standards-based, open-source printing system, and `libppd` can be used for legacy PPD file support. The `libppd` function `ppdCreatePPDFromIPP2` does not sanitize IPP attributes when creating the PPD buffer. When used in combination with other functions such as `cfGetPrinterAttributes5`, can result in user controlled input and ultimately code execution via Foomatic. This vulnerability can be part of an exploit chain leading to remote code execution (RCE), as described in CVE-2024-47176.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "CUPS is a standards-based, open-source printing system, and `libppd` can be used for legacy PPD file support. The `libppd` function `ppdCreatePPDFromIPP2` does not sanitize IPP attributes when creating the PPD buffer. When used in combination with other functions such as `cfGetPrinterAttributes5`, can result in user controlled input and ultimately code execution via Foomatic. This vulnerability can be part of an exploit chain leading to remote code execution (RCE), as described in CVE-2024-47176.", }, { lang: "es", value: "CUPS es un sistema de impresión de código abierto basado en estándares, y `libppd` se puede utilizar para la compatibilidad con archivos PPD heredados. La función `libppd` `ppdCreatePPDFromIPP2` no desinfecta los atributos IPP al crear el búfer PPD. Cuando se utiliza en combinación con otras funciones como `cfGetPrinterAttributes5`, puede dar lugar a una entrada controlada por el usuario y, en última instancia, a la ejecución de código a través de Foomatic. Esta vulnerabilidad puede ser parte de una cadena de explotación que conduce a la ejecución remota de código (RCE), como se describe en CVE-2024-47176.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-47175", lastModified: "2024-11-21T09:39:28.730", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 8.6, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "CHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 4, source: "security-advisories@github.com", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2024-09-26T22:15:04.283", references: [ { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-browsed/security/advisories/GHSA-rj88-6mr5-rcw8", }, { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/security/advisories/GHSA-p9rh-jxmq-gq47", }, { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://github.com/OpenPrinting/libcupsfilters/security/advisories/GHSA-w63j-6g73-wmg5", }, { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://github.com/OpenPrinting/libppd/security/advisories/GHSA-7xfx-47qg-grp6", }, { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://www.cups.org", }, { source: "security-advisories@github.com", url: "https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems-via-CUPS-Part-I", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/27/3", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://github.com/OpenPrinting/libppd/commit/d681747ebf12602cb426725eb8ce2753211e2477", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/09/msg00047.html", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "security-advisories@github.com", vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-20", }, ], source: "security-advisories@github.com", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.