fkie_cve-2024-46748
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-09-18 08:15
Modified
2024-09-20 12:30
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cachefiles: Set the max subreq size for cache writes to MAX_RW_COUNT
Set the maximum size of a subrequest that writes to cachefiles to be
MAX_RW_COUNT so that we don't overrun the maximum write we can make to the
backing filesystem.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncachefiles: Set the max subreq size for cache writes to MAX_RW_COUNT\n\nSet the maximum size of a subrequest that writes to cachefiles to be\nMAX_RW_COUNT so that we don't overrun the maximum write we can make to the\nbacking filesystem.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: cachefiles: Establezca el tamaño máximo de subsolicitud para escrituras de caché en MAX_RW_COUNT Establezca el tamaño máximo de una subsolicitud que escribe en cachefiles en MAX_RW_COUNT para que no sobrepasemos la escritura máxima que podemos realizar en el sistema de archivos de respaldo.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-46748", lastModified: "2024-09-20T12:30:51.220", metrics: {}, published: "2024-09-18T08:15:03.847", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51d37982bbac3ea0ca21b2797a9cb0044272b3aa", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cec226f9b1fd6cf55bc157873aec61b523083e96", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.