fkie_cve-2024-42151
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-07-30 08:15
Modified
2024-12-09 23:09
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: mark bpf_dummy_struct_ops.test_1 parameter as nullable
Test case dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value passes NULL as the first
parameter of the test_1() function. Mark this parameter as nullable to
make verifier aware of such possibility.
Otherwise, NULL check in the test_1() code:
SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
int BPF_PROG(test_1, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state)
{
if (!state)
return ...;
... access state ...
}
Might be removed by verifier, thus triggering NULL pointer dereference
under certain conditions.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "EDD11F94-D8F3-477D-931C-7806D6E5D6D3", versionEndExcluding: "6.9.9", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: mark bpf_dummy_struct_ops.test_1 parameter as nullable\n\nTest case dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value passes NULL as the first\nparameter of the test_1() function. Mark this parameter as nullable to\nmake verifier aware of such possibility.\nOtherwise, NULL check in the test_1() code:\n\n SEC(\"struct_ops/test_1\")\n int BPF_PROG(test_1, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state)\n {\n if (!state)\n return ...;\n\n ... access state ...\n }\n\nMight be removed by verifier, thus triggering NULL pointer dereference\nunder certain conditions.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bpf: marcar el parámetro bpf_dummy_struct_ops.test_1 como anulable Caso de prueba dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value pasa NULL como primer parámetro de la función test_1(). Marque este parámetro como anulable para que el verificador sea consciente de tal posibilidad. De lo contrario, NULL verifica el código test_1(): SEC(\"struct_ops/test_1\") int BPF_PROG(test_1, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state) { if (!state) return...; ... estado de acceso ... } El verificador podría eliminarlo, lo que provocaría la desreferencia del puntero NULL bajo ciertas condiciones.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-42151", lastModified: "2024-12-09T23:09:53.587", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 5.5, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2024-07-30T08:15:06.690", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1479eaff1f16983d8fda7c5a08a586c21891087d", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f79097b0de97a486b137b750d7dd7b20b519d23", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1479eaff1f16983d8fda7c5a08a586c21891087d", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f79097b0de97a486b137b750d7dd7b20b519d23", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Analyzed", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-476", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.