fkie_cve-2024-42130
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-07-30 08:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:33
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc/nci: Add the inconsistency check between the input data length and count write$nci(r0, &(0x7f0000000740)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="610501"], 0xf) Syzbot constructed a write() call with a data length of 3 bytes but a count value of 15, which passed too little data to meet the basic requirements of the function nci_rf_intf_activated_ntf_packet(). Therefore, increasing the comparison between data length and count value to avoid problems caused by inconsistent data length and count.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfc/nci: Add the inconsistency check between the input data length and count\n\nwrite$nci(r0, \u0026(0x7f0000000740)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB=\"610501\"], 0xf)\n\nSyzbot constructed a write() call with a data length of 3 bytes but a count value\nof 15, which passed too little data to meet the basic requirements of the function\nnci_rf_intf_activated_ntf_packet().\n\nTherefore, increasing the comparison between data length and count value to avoid\nproblems caused by inconsistent data length and count."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": " En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: nfc/nci: agregue la verificaci\u00f3n de inconsistencia entre la longitud de los datos de entrada y el recuento write$nci(r0, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000740)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB=\"610501\"], 0xf ) Syzbot construy\u00f3 una llamada write() con una longitud de datos de 3 bytes pero un valor de conteo de 15, que pas\u00f3 muy pocos datos para cumplir con los requisitos b\u00e1sicos de la funci\u00f3n nci_rf_intf_activated_ntf_packet(). Por lo tanto, aumentar la comparaci\u00f3n entre la longitud de los datos y el valor del recuento para evitar problemas causados por una longitud y un recuento de datos inconsistentes."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-42130",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:33:39.923",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2024-07-30T08:15:05.053",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/056478b4321b36ca33567089d39ac992f6c9c37a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/068648aab72c9ba7b0597354ef4d81ffaac7b979"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22a72c1c10f43ca645a98725e0faff34592f4d08"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41f5e2840cd0629f049ce5ce2f8dd10a8299de42"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f07bcd8bba803c9e6ad2048543185d6c56587a2f"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/056478b4321b36ca33567089d39ac992f6c9c37a"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/068648aab72c9ba7b0597354ef4d81ffaac7b979"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22a72c1c10f43ca645a98725e0faff34592f4d08"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41f5e2840cd0629f049ce5ce2f8dd10a8299de42"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f07bcd8bba803c9e6ad2048543185d6c56587a2f"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.