fkie_cve-2024-40943
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-07-12 13:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:31
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix races between hole punching and AIO+DIO
After commit "ocfs2: return real error code in ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block",
fstests/generic/300 become from always failed to sometimes failed:
========================================================================
[ 473.293420 ] run fstests generic/300
[ 475.296983 ] JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal
[ 475.302473 ] ocfs2: Mounting device (253,1) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.
[ 494.290998 ] OCFS2: ERROR (device dm-1): ocfs2_change_extent_flag: Owner 5668 has an extent at cpos 78723 which can no longer be found
[ 494.291609 ] On-disk corruption discovered. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the filesystem is unmounted.
[ 494.292018 ] OCFS2: File system is now read-only.
[ 494.292224 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_mark_extent_written:5272 ERROR: status = -30
[ 494.292602 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_dio_end_io_write:2374 ERROR: status = -3
fio: io_u error on file /mnt/scratch/racer: Read-only file system: write offset=460849152, buflen=131072
=========================================================================
In __blockdev_direct_IO, ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block is called to add unwritten
extents to a list. extents are also inserted into extent tree in
ocfs2_write_begin_nolock. Then another thread call fallocate to puch a
hole at one of the unwritten extent. The extent at cpos was removed by
ocfs2_remove_extent(). At end io worker thread, ocfs2_search_extent_list
found there is no such extent at the cpos.
T1 T2 T3
inode lock
...
insert extents
...
inode unlock
ocfs2_fallocate
__ocfs2_change_file_space
inode lock
lock ip_alloc_sem
ocfs2_remove_inode_range inode
ocfs2_remove_btree_range
ocfs2_remove_extent
^---remove the extent at cpos 78723
...
unlock ip_alloc_sem
inode unlock
ocfs2_dio_end_io
ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
lock ip_alloc_sem
ocfs2_mark_extent_written
ocfs2_change_extent_flag
ocfs2_search_extent_list
^---failed to find extent
...
unlock ip_alloc_sem
In most filesystems, fallocate is not compatible with racing with AIO+DIO,
so fix it by adding to wait for all dio before fallocate/punch_hole like
ext4.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: fix races between hole punching and AIO+DIO\n\nAfter commit \"ocfs2: return real error code in ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block\",\nfstests/generic/300 become from always failed to sometimes failed:\n\n========================================================================\n[ 473.293420 ] run fstests generic/300\n\n[ 475.296983 ] JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal\n[ 475.302473 ] ocfs2: Mounting device (253,1) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.\n[ 494.290998 ] OCFS2: ERROR (device dm-1): ocfs2_change_extent_flag: Owner 5668 has an extent at cpos 78723 which can no longer be found\n[ 494.291609 ] On-disk corruption discovered. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the filesystem is unmounted.\n[ 494.292018 ] OCFS2: File system is now read-only.\n[ 494.292224 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_mark_extent_written:5272 ERROR: status = -30\n[ 494.292602 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_dio_end_io_write:2374 ERROR: status = -3\nfio: io_u error on file /mnt/scratch/racer: Read-only file system: write offset=460849152, buflen=131072\n=========================================================================\n\nIn __blockdev_direct_IO, ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block is called to add unwritten\nextents to a list. extents are also inserted into extent tree in\nocfs2_write_begin_nolock. Then another thread call fallocate to puch a\nhole at one of the unwritten extent. The extent at cpos was removed by\nocfs2_remove_extent(). At end io worker thread, ocfs2_search_extent_list\nfound there is no such extent at the cpos.\n\n T1 T2 T3\n inode lock\n ...\n insert extents\n ...\n inode unlock\nocfs2_fallocate\n __ocfs2_change_file_space\n inode lock\n lock ip_alloc_sem\n ocfs2_remove_inode_range inode\n ocfs2_remove_btree_range\n ocfs2_remove_extent\n ^---remove the extent at cpos 78723\n ...\n unlock ip_alloc_sem\n inode unlock\n ocfs2_dio_end_io\n ocfs2_dio_end_io_write\n lock ip_alloc_sem\n ocfs2_mark_extent_written\n ocfs2_change_extent_flag\n ocfs2_search_extent_list\n ^---failed to find extent\n ...\n unlock ip_alloc_sem\n\nIn most filesystems, fallocate is not compatible with racing with AIO+DIO,\nso fix it by adding to wait for all dio before fallocate/punch_hole like\next4.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ocfs2: corrige ejecuciones entre perforación y AIO+DIO Después de confirmar \"ocfs2: devuelve código de error real en ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block\", fstests/generic/300 pasa de siempre falló a a veces falló: = ==================================================== ===================== [ 473.293420 ] ejecute fstests generic/300 [ 475.296983 ] JBD2: ignorando la información de recuperación en el diario [ 475.302473 ] ocfs2: Dispositivo de montaje (253,1 ) en (nodo local, ranura 0) con modo de datos ordenados. [ 494.290998 ] OCFS2: ERROR (dispositivo dm-1): ocfs2_change_extent_flag: El propietario 5668 tiene una extensión en cpos 78723 que ya no se puede encontrar [ 494.291609 ] Se descubrió corrupción en el disco. Ejecute fsck.ocfs2 una vez que el sistema de archivos esté desmontado. [ 494.292018 ] OCFS2: el sistema de archivos ahora es de solo lectura. [ 494.292224 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_mark_extent_write:5272 ERROR: estado = -30 [ 494.292602 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_dio_end_io_write:2374 ERROR: estado = -3 fio: Error io_u en el archivo /mnt/scratch/racer: sistema de archivos de solo lectura: escritura offset=460849152, buflen=131072 ========================== ================================================= En __blockdev_direct_IO , se llama a ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block para agregar extensiones no escritas a una lista. Las extensiones también se insertan en el árbol de extensiones en ocfs2_write_begin_nolock. Luego, otro hilo llama a fallocate para hacer un agujero en una de las extensiones no escritas. La extensión en cpos fue eliminada por ocfs2_remove_extent(). Al final del hilo de trabajo de io, ocfs2_search_extent_list descubrió que no existe tal extensión en los cpos. T1 T2 T3 bloqueo de inodo... insertar extensiones... desbloqueo de inodo ocfs2_fallocate __ocfs2_change_file_space bloqueo de inodo bloqueo ip_alloc_sem ocfs2_remove_inode_range inodo ocfs2_remove_btree_range ocfs2_remove_extent ^---eliminar la extensión en cpos 78723... desbloquear inodo ip_alloc_sem desbloquear ocfs2_dio_end_io ocfs2_dio_end_io_write bloquear ip_alloc_sem ocfs2_mark_extent_writing ocfs2_change_extent_flag ocfs2_search_extent_list ^ ---no se pudo encontrar la extensión... desbloquear ip_alloc_sem En la mayoría de los sistemas de archivos, fallocate no es compatible con ejecuciones con AIO+DIO, así que solucionelo agregando esperar a que todos los dio antes de fallocate/punch_hole como ext4.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-40943", lastModified: "2024-11-21T09:31:55.223", metrics: {}, published: "2024-07-12T13:15:16.670", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/050ce8af6838c71e872e982b50d3f1bec21da40e", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/117b9c009b72a6c2ebfd23484354dfee2d9570d2", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38825ff9da91d2854dcf6d9ac320a7e641e10f25", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c26b5d21b1239e9c7fd31ba7d9b2d7bdbaa68d9", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c361f313d696df72f9bccf058510e9ec737b9b1", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/952b023f06a24b2ad6ba67304c4c84d45bea2f18", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8e2db1adac47970a6a9225f3858e9aa0e86287f", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea042dc2bea19d72e37c298bf65a9c341ef3fff3", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/050ce8af6838c71e872e982b50d3f1bec21da40e", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/117b9c009b72a6c2ebfd23484354dfee2d9570d2", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38825ff9da91d2854dcf6d9ac320a7e641e10f25", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c26b5d21b1239e9c7fd31ba7d9b2d7bdbaa68d9", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c361f313d696df72f9bccf058510e9ec737b9b1", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/952b023f06a24b2ad6ba67304c4c84d45bea2f18", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8e2db1adac47970a6a9225f3858e9aa0e86287f", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea042dc2bea19d72e37c298bf65a9c341ef3fff3", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.