fkie_cve-2024-38616
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-06-19 14:15
Modified
2025-04-01 18:27
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: carl9170: re-fix fortified-memset warning
The carl9170_tx_release() function sometimes triggers a fortified-memset
warning in my randconfig builds:
In file included from include/linux/string.h:254,
from drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:40:
In function 'fortify_memset_chk',
inlined from 'carl9170_tx_release' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:283:2,
inlined from 'kref_put' at include/linux/kref.h:65:3,
inlined from 'carl9170_tx_put_skb' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:342:9:
include/linux/fortify-string.h:493:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
493 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
Kees previously tried to avoid this by using memset_after(), but it seems
this does not fully address the problem. I noticed that the memset_after()
here is done on a different part of the union (status) than the original
cast was from (rate_driver_data), which may confuse the compiler.
Unfortunately, the memset_after() trick does not work on driver_rates[]
because that is part of an anonymous struct, and I could not get
struct_group() to do this either. Using two separate memset() calls
on the two members does address the warning though.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "899D7A4F-A23D-4FA2-84B4-4BAA03F98BBC", versionEndExcluding: "6.1.93", versionStartIncluding: "5.17", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E", versionEndExcluding: "6.6.33", versionStartIncluding: "6.2", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "80550309-67AB-4FD1-AC07-3DED5C4F01B2", versionEndExcluding: "6.8.12", versionStartIncluding: "6.7", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011", versionEndExcluding: "6.9.3", versionStartIncluding: "6.9", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: carl9170: re-fix fortified-memset warning\n\nThe carl9170_tx_release() function sometimes triggers a fortified-memset\nwarning in my randconfig builds:\n\nIn file included from include/linux/string.h:254,\n from drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:40:\nIn function 'fortify_memset_chk',\n inlined from 'carl9170_tx_release' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:283:2,\n inlined from 'kref_put' at include/linux/kref.h:65:3,\n inlined from 'carl9170_tx_put_skb' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:342:9:\ninclude/linux/fortify-string.h:493:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]\n 493 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);\n\nKees previously tried to avoid this by using memset_after(), but it seems\nthis does not fully address the problem. I noticed that the memset_after()\nhere is done on a different part of the union (status) than the original\ncast was from (rate_driver_data), which may confuse the compiler.\n\nUnfortunately, the memset_after() trick does not work on driver_rates[]\nbecause that is part of an anonymous struct, and I could not get\nstruct_group() to do this either. Using two separate memset() calls\non the two members does address the warning though.", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: wifi: carl9170: volver a corregir la advertencia de memset fortificado La función carl9170_tx_release() a veces activa una advertencia de memset fortificado en mis compilaciones de randconfig: en el archivo incluido en include/linux/string. h:254, de drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:40: en la función 'fortify_memset_chk', insertado desde 'carl9170_tx_release' en drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:283:2 , incluido desde 'kref_put' en include/linux/kref.h:65:3, incluido desde 'carl9170_tx_put_skb' en drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c:342:9: include/linux/fortify-string .h:493:25: error: llamada a '__write_overflow_field' declarada con advertencia de atributo: escritura detectada más allá del tamaño del campo (primer parámetro); ¿Quizás usar struct_group()? [-Werror=advertencia-atributo] 493 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, tamaño); Kees anteriormente intentó evitar esto usando memset_after(), pero parece que esto no soluciona completamente el problema. Me di cuenta de que memset_after() aquí se realiza en una parte diferente de la unión (estado) de la que provenía la conversión original (rate_driver_data), lo que puede confundir al compilador. Desafortunadamente, el truco memset_after() no funciona en driver_rates[] porque es parte de una estructura anónima y tampoco pude lograr que struct_group() hiciera esto. Sin embargo, el uso de dos llamadas memset() separadas en los dos miembros soluciona la advertencia.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-38616", lastModified: "2025-04-01T18:27:13.400", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 8.2, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "LOW", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 4.2, source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2024-06-19T14:15:21.403", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/042a39bb8e0812466327a5102606e88a5a4f8c02", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/066afafc10c9476ee36c47c9062527a17e763901", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c38c9c460bb8ce8d6f6cf316e0d71a70983ec83", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13857683126e8a6492af73c74d702835f7a2175b", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87586467098281f04fa93e59fe3a516b954bddc4", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/042a39bb8e0812466327a5102606e88a5a4f8c02", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/066afafc10c9476ee36c47c9062527a17e763901", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c38c9c460bb8ce8d6f6cf316e0d71a70983ec83", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13857683126e8a6492af73c74d702835f7a2175b", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87586467098281f04fa93e59fe3a516b954bddc4", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Analyzed", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-400", }, ], source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.