fkie_cve-2024-38574
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-06-19 14:15
Modified
2025-01-31 15:18
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libbpf: Prevent null-pointer dereference when prog to load has no BTF In bpf_objec_load_prog(), there's no guarantee that obj->btf is non-NULL when passing it to btf__fd(), and this function does not perform any check before dereferencing its argument (as bpf_object__btf_fd() used to do). As a consequence, we get segmentation fault errors in bpftool (for example) when trying to load programs that come without BTF information. v2: Keep btf__fd() in the fix instead of reverting to bpf_object__btf_fd().
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *



{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "32F3B5DB-BFED-4D0E-86BB-2B6ECB1CEFB9",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.8.12",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.8",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011",
                     versionEndExcluding: "6.9.3",
                     versionStartIncluding: "6.9",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibbpf: Prevent null-pointer dereference when prog to load has no BTF\n\nIn bpf_objec_load_prog(), there's no guarantee that obj->btf is non-NULL\nwhen passing it to btf__fd(), and this function does not perform any\ncheck before dereferencing its argument (as bpf_object__btf_fd() used to\ndo). As a consequence, we get segmentation fault errors in bpftool (for\nexample) when trying to load programs that come without BTF information.\n\nv2: Keep btf__fd() in the fix instead of reverting to bpf_object__btf_fd().",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: libbpf: evita la desreferencia del puntero nulo cuando el programa a cargar no tiene BTF. En bpf_objec_load_prog(), no hay garantía de que obj->btf no sea NULL al pasarlo a btf__fd() , y esta función no realiza ninguna verificación antes de eliminar la referencia a su argumento (como solía hacer bpf_object__btf_fd()). Como consecuencia, obtenemos errores de segmentación en bpftool (por ejemplo) cuando intentamos cargar programas que vienen sin información BTF. v2: Mantenga btf__fd() en la solución en lugar de volver a bpf_object__btf_fd().",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-38574",
   lastModified: "2025-01-31T15:18:10.893",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "LOCAL",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 5.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 1.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2024-06-19T14:15:17.520",
   references: [
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fd91360a75833b7110af9834ae26c977e1273e0",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bf48fa19a4b1d186e08b20bf7e5de26a15644fb",
      },
      {
         source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80b59acfa4dee4b5eaccb15572b69248831104",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fd91360a75833b7110af9834ae26c977e1273e0",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bf48fa19a4b1d186e08b20bf7e5de26a15644fb",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Patch",
         ],
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80b59acfa4dee4b5eaccb15572b69248831104",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
   vulnStatus: "Analyzed",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-476",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.