fkie_cve-2024-33851
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-04-27 22:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:17
Severity ?
Summary
phpecc, as used in paragonie/phpecc before 2.0.1, has a branch-based timing leak in Point addition. (This is related to phpecc/phpecc on GitHub, and the Matyas Danter ECC library.)
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "phpecc, as used in paragonie/phpecc before 2.0.1, has a branch-based timing leak in Point addition. (This is related to phpecc/phpecc on GitHub, and the Matyas Danter ECC library.)", }, { lang: "es", value: "phpecc, como se usa en paragonie/phpecc antes de 2.0.1, tiene una fuga de sincronización basada en ramas además de Point. (Esto está relacionado con phpecc/phpecc en GitHub y la librería Matyas Danter ECC).", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-33851", lastModified: "2024-11-21T09:17:35.070", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 4.3, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "LOW", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 2.8, impactScore: 1.4, source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2024-04-27T22:15:08.050", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "https://github.com/paragonie/phpecc/releases/tag/v2.0.1", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://github.com/paragonie/phpecc/releases/tag/v2.0.1", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.