fkie_cve-2024-1013
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-03-18 11:15
Modified
2025-03-26 05:15
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
An out-of-bounds stack write flaw was found in unixODBC on 64-bit architectures where the caller has 4 bytes and callee writes 8 bytes. This issue may go unnoticed on little-endian architectures, while big-endian architectures can be broken.
References
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:unixodbc:unixodbc:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "55099A48-74BF-49AE-A928-E2B869F8CE64", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "An out-of-bounds stack write flaw was found in unixODBC on 64-bit architectures where the caller has 4 bytes and callee writes 8 bytes. This issue may go unnoticed on little-endian architectures, while big-endian architectures can be broken.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Se encontró una falla de escritura de pila fuera de los límites en unixODBC en arquitecturas de 64 bits donde la persona que llama tiene 4 bytes y la persona que llama escribe 8 bytes. Este problema puede pasar desapercibido en las arquitecturas little-endian, mientras que las arquitecturas big-endian pueden romperse.", }, ], id: "CVE-2024-1013", lastModified: "2025-03-26T05:15:39.920", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 5.9, source: "secalert@redhat.com", type: "Primary", }, { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2024-03-18T11:15:09.227", references: [ { source: "secalert@redhat.com", tags: [ "Broken Link", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1013", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260823", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://github.com/lurcher/unixODBC/pull/157", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Broken Link", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1013", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260823", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", ], url: "https://github.com/lurcher/unixODBC/pull/157", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-823", }, ], source: "secalert@redhat.com", type: "Secondary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-Other", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.