fkie_cve-2023-52767
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-05-21 16:15
Modified
2025-01-06 20:29
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record
syzkaller discovered that if tls_sw_splice_eof() is executed as part of
sendfile() when the plaintext/ciphertext sk_msg are empty, the send path
gets confused because the empty ciphertext buffer does not have enough
space for the encryption overhead. This causes tls_push_record() to go on
the `split = true` path (which is only supposed to be used when interacting
with an attached BPF program), and then get further confused and hit the
tls_merge_open_record() path, which then assumes that there must be at
least one populated buffer element, leading to a NULL deref.
It is possible to have empty plaintext/ciphertext buffers if we previously
bailed from tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() via the tls_trim_both_msgs() path.
tls_sw_push_pending_record() already handles this case correctly; let's do
the same check in tls_sw_splice_eof().
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.7 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.7 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "C5AC7A97-CD56-4012-B418-D5FF1799F8CC", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.4", "versionStartIncluding": "6.5", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3A0038DE-E183-4958-A6E3-CE3821FEAFBF", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E31AD4FC-436C-44AB-BCAB-3A0B37F69EE0", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record\n\nsyzkaller discovered that if tls_sw_splice_eof() is executed as part of\nsendfile() when the plaintext/ciphertext sk_msg are empty, the send path\ngets confused because the empty ciphertext buffer does not have enough\nspace for the encryption overhead. This causes tls_push_record() to go on\nthe `split = true` path (which is only supposed to be used when interacting\nwith an attached BPF program), and then get further confused and hit the\ntls_merge_open_record() path, which then assumes that there must be at\nleast one populated buffer element, leading to a NULL deref.\n\nIt is possible to have empty plaintext/ciphertext buffers if we previously\nbailed from tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() via the tls_trim_both_msgs() path.\ntls_sw_push_pending_record() already handles this case correctly; let\u0027s do\nthe same check in tls_sw_splice_eof()." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: tls: corrige NULL deref en tls_sw_splice_eof() con registro vac\u00edo syzkaller descubri\u00f3 que si tls_sw_splice_eof() se ejecuta como parte de sendfile() cuando el texto plano/texto cifrado sk_msg est\u00e1 vac\u00edo, el env\u00edo La ruta se confunde porque el b\u00fafer de texto cifrado vac\u00edo no tiene suficiente espacio para la sobrecarga de cifrado. Esto hace que tls_push_record() vaya a la ruta `split = true` (que se supone que solo debe usarse al interactuar con un programa BPF adjunto), y luego se confunda a\u00fan m\u00e1s y acceda a la ruta tls_merge_open_record(), que luego supone que hay debe haber al menos un elemento de b\u00fafer poblado, lo que lleva a una deref NULL. Es posible tener buffers de texto plano/texto cifrado vac\u00edos si previamente salimos de tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() a trav\u00e9s de la ruta tls_trim_both_msgs(). tls_sw_push_pending_record() ya maneja este caso correctamente; hagamos la misma verificaci\u00f3n en tls_sw_splice_eof()." } ], "id": "CVE-2023-52767", "lastModified": "2025-01-06T20:29:40.047", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-05-21T16:15:15.917", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2214e2bb5489145aba944874d0ee1652a0a63dc8" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53f2cb491b500897a619ff6abd72f565933760f0" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/944900fe2736c07288efe2d9394db4d3ca23f2c9" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2214e2bb5489145aba944874d0ee1652a0a63dc8" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53f2cb491b500897a619ff6abd72f565933760f0" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/944900fe2736c07288efe2d9394db4d3ca23f2c9" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.