fkie_cve-2023-52767
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-05-21 16:15
Modified
2025-01-06 20:29
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record
syzkaller discovered that if tls_sw_splice_eof() is executed as part of
sendfile() when the plaintext/ciphertext sk_msg are empty, the send path
gets confused because the empty ciphertext buffer does not have enough
space for the encryption overhead. This causes tls_push_record() to go on
the `split = true` path (which is only supposed to be used when interacting
with an attached BPF program), and then get further confused and hit the
tls_merge_open_record() path, which then assumes that there must be at
least one populated buffer element, leading to a NULL deref.
It is possible to have empty plaintext/ciphertext buffers if we previously
bailed from tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() via the tls_trim_both_msgs() path.
tls_sw_push_pending_record() already handles this case correctly; let's do
the same check in tls_sw_splice_eof().
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.7 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.7 |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "C5AC7A97-CD56-4012-B418-D5FF1799F8CC", versionEndExcluding: "6.6.4", versionStartIncluding: "6.5", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "3A0038DE-E183-4958-A6E3-CE3821FEAFBF", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "E31AD4FC-436C-44AB-BCAB-3A0B37F69EE0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntls: fix NULL deref on tls_sw_splice_eof() with empty record\n\nsyzkaller discovered that if tls_sw_splice_eof() is executed as part of\nsendfile() when the plaintext/ciphertext sk_msg are empty, the send path\ngets confused because the empty ciphertext buffer does not have enough\nspace for the encryption overhead. This causes tls_push_record() to go on\nthe `split = true` path (which is only supposed to be used when interacting\nwith an attached BPF program), and then get further confused and hit the\ntls_merge_open_record() path, which then assumes that there must be at\nleast one populated buffer element, leading to a NULL deref.\n\nIt is possible to have empty plaintext/ciphertext buffers if we previously\nbailed from tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() via the tls_trim_both_msgs() path.\ntls_sw_push_pending_record() already handles this case correctly; let's do\nthe same check in tls_sw_splice_eof().", }, { lang: "es", value: "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: tls: corrige NULL deref en tls_sw_splice_eof() con registro vacío syzkaller descubrió que si tls_sw_splice_eof() se ejecuta como parte de sendfile() cuando el texto plano/texto cifrado sk_msg está vacío, el envío La ruta se confunde porque el búfer de texto cifrado vacío no tiene suficiente espacio para la sobrecarga de cifrado. Esto hace que tls_push_record() vaya a la ruta `split = true` (que se supone que solo debe usarse al interactuar con un programa BPF adjunto), y luego se confunda aún más y acceda a la ruta tls_merge_open_record(), que luego supone que hay debe haber al menos un elemento de búfer poblado, lo que lleva a una deref NULL. Es posible tener buffers de texto plano/texto cifrado vacíos si previamente salimos de tls_sw_sendmsg_locked() a través de la ruta tls_trim_both_msgs(). tls_sw_push_pending_record() ya maneja este caso correctamente; hagamos la misma verificación en tls_sw_splice_eof().", }, ], id: "CVE-2023-52767", lastModified: "2025-01-06T20:29:40.047", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 5.5, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2024-05-21T16:15:15.917", references: [ { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2214e2bb5489145aba944874d0ee1652a0a63dc8", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53f2cb491b500897a619ff6abd72f565933760f0", }, { source: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/944900fe2736c07288efe2d9394db4d3ca23f2c9", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2214e2bb5489145aba944874d0ee1652a0a63dc8", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53f2cb491b500897a619ff6abd72f565933760f0", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", ], url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/944900fe2736c07288efe2d9394db4d3ca23f2c9", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Analyzed", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-476", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.