fkie_cve-2022-3182
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-09-13 20:15
Modified
2024-11-21 07:18
Severity ?
7.0 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Improper Access Control vulnerability in the Duo SMS two-factor of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.2.14 and earlier allows attackers to bypass the application lock. This issue affects: Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager version 2022.2.14 and prior versions.
References
security@devolutions.nethttps://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2022-0007Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2022-0007Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
devolutions remote_desktop_manager *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:remote_desktop_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5D025500-73B7-4EC1-BC5F-35F5BFE7D1E9",
              "versionEndExcluding": "2022.2.15",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Access Control vulnerability in the Duo SMS two-factor of Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.2.14 and earlier allows attackers to bypass the application lock. This issue affects: Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager version 2022.2.14 and prior versions."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de Control de Acceso Inapropiado en el doble factor Duo SMS de Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.2.14 y anteriores, permite a atacantes omitir un bloqueo de la aplicaci\u00f3n. Este problema afecta a: Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager versiones 2022.2.14 y versiones anteriores"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-3182",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:18:59.507",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.0,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-09-13T20:15:09.887",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@devolutions.net",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2022-0007"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2022-0007"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@devolutions.net",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-284"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@devolutions.net",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.