fkie_cve-2017-6363
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2020-02-27 05:15
Modified
2024-11-21 03:29
Severity ?
Summary
In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says "In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be 'obsolete, and should only be used for development and testing purposes.'
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/383 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/383 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:libgd:libgd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1C8F4811-034F-41ED-B690-188B0BE7D7DD",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.2.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says \"In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be \u0027obsolete, and should only be used for development and testing purposes.\u0027"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** EN DISPUTA ** En la GD Graphics Library (tambi\u00e9n se conoce como Libgd) versiones hasta 2.2.5, se presenta una lectura excesiva del b\u00fafer en la regi\u00f3n heap de la memoria en tiffWriter en el archivo gd_tiff.c. NOTA: el proveedor dice \"In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be \u0027obsolete, and should only be used for development and testing purposes.\u0027\""
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-6363",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:29:38.060",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2020-02-27T05:15:11.007",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/383"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/383"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.