fkie_cve-2015-2676
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-03-23 16:59
Modified
2024-11-21 02:27
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ASUS RT-G32 routers with firmware 2.0.2.6 and 2.0.3.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via a request to start_apply.htm.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| asus | rt-g32_firmware | 2.0.2.6 | |
| asus | rt-g32_firmware | 2.0.3.2 | |
| asus | rt-g32 | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-g32_firmware:2.0.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B21BBA8F-73CB-4C10-8D25-12BA8A8FD4CC",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-g32_firmware:2.0.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "28B35FF4-75BB-4AE6-B3A7-BB5ABB3AB5B3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-g32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3363698A-B79E-4EC0-9D12-685DC86B35D9",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ASUS RT-G32 routers with firmware 2.0.2.6 and 2.0.3.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via a request to start_apply.htm."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de CSRF en los routers ASUS RT-G32 con firmware 2.0.2.6 y 2.0.3.2 permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de administradores por peticiones que cambian la contrase\u00f1a de administrador a trav\u00e9s de una petici\u00f3n a start_apply.htm."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-2676",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:27:49.793",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2015-03-23T16:59:03.617",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130724/ASUS-RT-G32-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Mar/42"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://websecurity.com.ua/7644/"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73294"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130724/ASUS-RT-G32-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Mar/42"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://websecurity.com.ua/7644/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73294"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.