fkie_cve-2013-0157
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2014-01-21 18:55
Modified
2024-11-21 01:46
Severity ?
Summary
(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
kernel | util-linux | 2.14.1 | |
kernel | util-linux | 2.17.2 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:kernel:util-linux:2.14.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E649C864-64A2-46A1-8D11-C2B5AE0122B8", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:kernel:util-linux:2.17.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "21667158-8A4D-4EF8-9E96-E35B4885480B", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "(a) mount y (b) unmount en util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, y probablemente otras versiones permite a usuarios locales determinar la existencia de directorios restringidos mediante (1) el uso de la opci\u00f3n de comando --guess-fstype command-line o (2) intentar montar un dispositivo inexistente, lo que genera diferentes mensajes de error dependiendo de si el directorio existe." } ], "id": "CVE-2013-0157", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:46:57.693", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "LOW", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "LOCAL", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 2.1, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ] }, "published": "2014-01-21T18:55:09.007", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/697464" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=135749410312247\u0026w=2" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://osvdb.org/88953" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:154" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892330" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/697464" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=135749410312247\u0026w=2" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://osvdb.org/88953" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:154" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892330" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-200" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.