fkie_cve-2012-4575
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2012-11-18 19:55
Modified
2024-11-21 01:43
Severity ?
Summary
The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
pgbouncer_project | pgbouncer | 1.5.2 | |
postgresql | postgresql | - |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:pgbouncer_project:pgbouncer:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "F46A0B5B-9259-4C34-913B-ACBC876A35DB", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" }, { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "ECC070DF-4131-43BA-B975-907023E0D39F", "vulnerable": false } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ], "operator": "AND" } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The add_database function in objects.c in the pgbouncer pooler 1.5.2 for PostgreSQL allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a long database name in a request." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "La funci\u00f3n add_database en objects.c en pgbouncer pooler v1.5.2 para PostgreSQL permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (parada del demonio) a trav\u00e9s de un nombre de base de datos demasiado largo en una solicitud." } ], "id": "CVE-2012-4575", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:43:10.230", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ] }, "published": "2012-11-18T19:55:01.290", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692103" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgbouncer.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=4b92112b820830b30cd7bc91bef3dd8f35305525" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/02/8" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56371" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872527" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-119" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.