fkie_cve-2011-0389
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2011-02-25 12:00
Modified
2024-11-21 01:23
Severity ?
Summary
Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch (CTMS) devices with software 1.0.x, 1.1.x, 1.5.x, and 1.6.x allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via a crafted Real-Time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP) UDP packet, aka Bug ID CSCth60993.
References
Impacted products
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.0.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8AD084A4-0AA0-499F-9D2F-9AD0FC87B0B1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B862A01F-71E8-412F-AF83-3A64FB7352EC",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "909CA78F-933F-4C79-8F91-D6B17FCD7093",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6C885CA7-3DCC-4C05-8945-FBF2CD08EACA",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4D000335-5F60-49A8-B642-A5BEDC6A6820",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BBBD9AB4-AC7C-4D3D-AF93-1B9D8AAF31CA",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D1B8EF29-8A24-47C7-8108-07B27AF0FDC3",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D99CDCC2-5373-447E-9AB2-DEDB5C6327D9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "669BF6F3-CE41-43F2-BB6D-E594EB7CFCC7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "606E06B8-B00B-4EE1-A763-A62C9105C5E2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CECA0482-FD41-46E7-A8F9-54BC665A83FB",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E431D427-EA04-4296-BB23-D638ADA1FF8A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B70A01B1-CE17-47BF-9035-7168DF790125",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F0A9D905-3740-4B9D-A26C-DFA6CBD2D154",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "69F84CF3-ED9D-4962-8930-ACB5319AFF6C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch_software:1.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "260AD1B1-D5F3-433D-8B82-DF17197031C4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:telepresence_multipoint_switch:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2DC3BECB-61EE-4668-B139-D46BCF5E0F69",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch (CTMS) devices with software 1.0.x, 1.1.x, 1.5.x, and 1.6.x allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via a crafted Real-Time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP) UDP packet, aka Bug ID CSCth60993."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Dispositivos Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch (CTMS) con el software v1.0.x, v1.1.x, v1.5.x y v1.6.x permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda del proceso) a trav\u00e9s de un paquete Real-Time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP) UDP manipulado, tambi\u00e9n conocido como error ID CSCth60993."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2011-0389",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:23:52.033",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2011-02-25T12:00:18.963",
"references": [
{
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b6e14e.shtml"
},
{
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46520"
},
{
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025113"
},
{
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65622"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b6e14e.shtml"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46520"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025113"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65622"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-399"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.