fkie_cve-2008-4963
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2008-11-06 15:55
Modified
2024-11-21 00:52
Severity ?
Summary
Unspecified vulnerability in the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) implementation on Cisco IOS and CatOS, when the VTP operating mode is not transparent, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via a crafted VTP packet sent to a switch interface configured as a trunk port.
References
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:catos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "CE3424FF-8507-4C7A-8858-EA89931A74DB", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:ios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "5802E2D8-7069-474C-826F-AEE7B50BFE34", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Unspecified vulnerability in the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) implementation on Cisco IOS and CatOS, when the VTP operating mode is not transparent, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via a crafted VTP packet sent to a switch interface configured as a trunk port." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Vulnerabilidad inespec\u00edfica en la implementaci\u00f3n en Cisco IOS y CatOS del protocolo VLAN Trunking (VTP), cuando el modo de operaci\u00f3n de VTP no es transparente, permite a atacantes remotos producir una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (el dispositivo se recarga o se cuelga) a trav\u00e9s de un paquete VTP manipulado." } ], "id": "CVE-2008-4963", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T00:52:56.950", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 7.1, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 6.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ] }, "published": "2008-11-06T15:55:51.713", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://osvdb.org/49601" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32573" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021143" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a231cf.html" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32120" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021144" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46346" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://osvdb.org/49601" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32573" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021143" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a231cf.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32120" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021144" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46346" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.