FKIE_CVE-2007-3787
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2007-07-15 23:30 - Updated: 2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
The eSoft InstaGate EX2 UTM device does not require entry of the old password when changing the admin password, which might allow remote attackers to gain privileges by conducting a CSRF attack, making a password change from an unattended workstation, or other attacks.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| esoft | instagate_ex2_utm | firmware_3.1.20031001 | |
| esoft | instagate_ex2_utm | firmware_3.1.20060921 | |
| esoft | instagate_ex2_utm | firmware_3.1.20070605 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:esoft:instagate_ex2_utm:firmware_3.1.20031001:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "23C143C9-B4C9-4AED-8698-3A6BAB40E5B6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:esoft:instagate_ex2_utm:firmware_3.1.20060921:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DEC5A842-DDBB-4140-8A82-D6E5B5443501",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:esoft:instagate_ex2_utm:firmware_3.1.20070605:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A374FD80-4BDE-4E07-8E72-C651C42C6C28",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The eSoft InstaGate EX2 UTM device does not require entry of the old password when changing the admin password, which might allow remote attackers to gain privileges by conducting a CSRF attack, making a password change from an unattended workstation, or other attacks."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El dispositivo UTM eSoft InstaGate EX2 no requiere la introducci\u00f3n de una contrase\u00f1a antigua cuando se cambia la contrase\u00f1a de administrador, lo cual podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes remotos, obtener privilegios conduciendo un ataque CSRF, realizando un cambio de contrase\u00f1a desde una estaci\u00f3n de trabajo desatendida, u otros ataques."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2007-3787",
"lastModified": "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2007-07-15T23:30:00.000",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.php"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.txt"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/38175"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26005"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/473663/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.php"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://labs.calyptix.com/CX-2007-05.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/38175"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26005"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/473663/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…