CVE-2026-73645 (GCVE-0-2026-73645)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-13 17:54 – Updated: 2026-08-13 17:54
VLAI
Title
OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds.
Summary
OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal _mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol did not handle that failure, so a user could transfer the underlying token without receiving the corresponding confidential wrapped token. With the default rate(), the wrapper fills after approximately 18.4 trillion tokens, and subsequent wrapping requests can cause loss of funds. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.1.
CWE
  • CWE-190 - Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Assigner
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "openzeppelin-confidential-contracts",
          "vendor": "OpenZeppelin",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.3.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal _mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol did not handle that failure, so a user could transfer the underlying token without receiving the corresponding confidential wrapped token. With the default rate(), the wrapper fills after approximately 18.4 trillion tokens, and subsequent wrapping requests can cause loss of funds. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-190",
              "description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T17:54:42.793Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/pull/271",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/pull/271"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/commit/c620d4386021dde63ae3ea1507dee8543791134a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/commit/c620d4386021dde63ae3ea1507dee8543791134a"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/releases/tag/v0.3.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/releases/tag/v0.3.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds."
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-73645",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-13T17:54:42.793Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-13T14:04:09.604Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T17:54:42.793Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-73645",
      "date": "2026-08-14",
      "epss": "0.00384",
      "percentile": "0.31424"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-73645\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-13T18:18:20.277\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-13T18:18:20.277\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenZeppelin Confidential Contracts is an experimental library for developing applications on the Zama fhEVM. Prior to 0.3.1, the ERC7984 contract tracked confidential total supply with an euint64 value, and an overflowing internal _mint operation could fail silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol did not handle that failure, so a user could transfer the underlying token without receiving the corresponding confidential wrapped token. With the default rate(), the wrapper fills after approximately 18.4 trillion tokens, and subsequent wrapping requests can cause loss of funds. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.1.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"OpenZeppelin\",\"product\":\"openzeppelin-confidential-contracts\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 0.3.1\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"UNREPORTED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-190\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/commit/c620d4386021dde63ae3ea1507dee8543791134a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/pull/271\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/releases/tag/v0.3.1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…