GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-69159 (GCVE-0-2026-69159)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-19 18:02 – Updated: 2026-08-21 18:00
VLAI

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67306. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67306 instead of this candidate.

Replaced by CVE-2026-67306

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-21T18:00:15.024Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67306. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67306 instead of this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "replacedBy": [
        "CVE-2026-67306"
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-69159",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-19T18:02:01.016Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-08-21T18:00:15.024Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-03T15:47:09.655Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-21T18:00:15.024Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-69159",
      "date": "2026-08-21",
      "epss": "0.00266",
      "percentile": "0.1866"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-69159\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-19T18:17:19.813\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-21T18:16:50.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67306. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67306 instead of this candidate.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-31T14:14:58+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-69159",
      "id": "CVE-2026-69159",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-08-19T18:02:01.016000+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "65",
      "product_status:known_affected": "19",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "FreeRDP: FreeRDP: Out-of-bounds read leads to denial of service and information disclosure",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-69159.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-01T13:31:38Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-69159",
      "id": "CVE-2026-69159",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-09-01T13:31:38Z",
      "product_status:recommended": "6",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-69159",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-69159.json",
      "version": "2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.