GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-53706 (GCVE-0-2026-53706)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-02 17:54 – Updated: 2026-09-03 14:31
VLAI
Title
PREVAIL: ALU32 pointer arithmetic accepted without is64 gate — verifier emits false PASS for pointer-corrupting programs
Summary
PREVAIL is a Polynomial-Runtime EBPF Verifier using an Abstract Interpretation Layer. Prior to version 0.2.4, the prevail eBPF verifier accepts ALU32 ADD and SUB instructions that operate on pointer-typed registers without checking the is64 flag. Because ALU32 arithmetic zero-extends the 32-bit result, the upper half of any pointer is silently destroyed at runtime, yet prevail marks the program as verified safe. Any caller that can submit an eBPF program for verification — including unprivileged users on kernels that permit BPF program loading — can produce a program that passes verification but faults or misbehaves at runtime. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-03 14:11 UTC
CWE
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
vbpf prevail Affected: < 0.2.4
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-53706",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-03T14:11:10.569706Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T14:31:25.037Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "prevail",
          "vendor": "vbpf",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.2.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "PREVAIL is a Polynomial-Runtime EBPF Verifier using an Abstract Interpretation Layer. Prior to version 0.2.4, the prevail eBPF verifier accepts ALU32 ADD and SUB instructions that operate on pointer-typed registers without checking the is64 flag. Because ALU32 arithmetic zero-extends the 32-bit result, the upper half of any pointer is silently destroyed at runtime, yet prevail marks the program as verified safe. Any caller that can submit an eBPF program for verification \u2014 including unprivileged users on kernels that permit BPF program loading \u2014 can produce a program that passes verification but faults or misbehaves at runtime. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.4."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-02T17:54:59.163Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/security/advisories/GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/security/advisories/GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/commit/d3fab8c23a93d9a615bc741b254ab26391559e0f",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/commit/d3fab8c23a93d9a615bc741b254ab26391559e0f"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/releases/tag/v0.2.4",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/releases/tag/v0.2.4"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "PREVAIL: ALU32 pointer arithmetic accepted without is64 gate \u2014 verifier emits false PASS for pointer-corrupting programs"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-53706",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-02T17:54:59.163Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-10T16:43:31.241Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T14:31:25.037Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-53706",
      "date": "2026-09-04",
      "epss": "0.00291",
      "percentile": "0.21319"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-53706\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-09-02T18:20:00.433\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-03T15:17:30.490\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"PREVAIL is a Polynomial-Runtime EBPF Verifier using an Abstract Interpretation Layer. Prior to version 0.2.4, the prevail eBPF verifier accepts ALU32 ADD and SUB instructions that operate on pointer-typed registers without checking the is64 flag. Because ALU32 arithmetic zero-extends the 32-bit result, the upper half of any pointer is silently destroyed at runtime, yet prevail marks the program as verified safe. Any caller that can submit an eBPF program for verification \u2014 including unprivileged users on kernels that permit BPF program loading \u2014 can produce a program that passes verification but faults or misbehaves at runtime. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.4.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"vbpf\",\"product\":\"prevail\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 0.2.4\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-03T14:11:10.569706Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-53706\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-682\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/commit/d3fab8c23a93d9a615bc741b254ab26391559e0f\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/releases/tag/v0.2.4\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/security/advisories/GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-53706\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-03T14:11:10.569706Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-03T14:11:23.442Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"PREVAIL: ALU32 pointer arithmetic accepted without is64 gate \\u2014 verifier emits false PASS for pointer-corrupting programs\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"vbpf\", \"product\": \"prevail\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.2.4\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/security/advisories/GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/security/advisories/GHSA-65fp-5qmq-gg2m\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/commit/d3fab8c23a93d9a615bc741b254ab26391559e0f\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/commit/d3fab8c23a93d9a615bc741b254ab26391559e0f\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/releases/tag/v0.2.4\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/vbpf/prevail/releases/tag/v0.2.4\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"PREVAIL is a Polynomial-Runtime EBPF Verifier using an Abstract Interpretation Layer. Prior to version 0.2.4, the prevail eBPF verifier accepts ALU32 ADD and SUB instructions that operate on pointer-typed registers without checking the is64 flag. Because ALU32 arithmetic zero-extends the 32-bit result, the upper half of any pointer is silently destroyed at runtime, yet prevail marks the program as verified safe. Any caller that can submit an eBPF program for verification \\u2014 including unprivileged users on kernels that permit BPF program loading \\u2014 can produce a program that passes verification but faults or misbehaves at runtime. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.4.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-682\", \"description\": \"CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-02T17:54:59.163Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-53706\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-03T14:31:25.037Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-10T16:43:31.241Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-02T17:54:59.163Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…