CVE-2026-33757 (GCVE-0-2026-33757)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 14:10 – Updated: 2026-06-30 12:07
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
OpenBao lacks user confirmation for OIDC direct callback mode
Summary
OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform "remote phishing" by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.
Severity
9.6 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-384 - Session Fixation
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e321039… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#sec… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33757 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452269 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/v… | x_sadp-csaf-vex |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| openbao | openbao |
Affected:
< 2.5.2
|
|
| Red Hat | Cryostat 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33757",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T03:55:23.497Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in OpenBao. A missing prompt for user confirmation when logging in via the JWT/OIDC authentication method with a role configured to use `callback_mode=direct` allows an attacker to initiate an authentication request and perform a \"remote phishing\" attack by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted URL, automatically logging the user into the session of the attacker."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-384",
"description": "Session Fixation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:07:33.024Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33757"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452269",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452269"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33757.json"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T15:01:52.669Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "OpenBao: lack of user confirmation for OpenBao OIDC direct callback mode",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openbao",
"vendor": "openbao",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.5.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform \"remote phishing\" by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-384",
"description": "CWE-384: Session Fixation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e32103951925723e9787e33886ab6b6ec20f4964",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e32103951925723e9787e33886ab6b6ec20f4964"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#section-5.4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#section-5.4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenBao lacks user confirmation for OIDC direct callback mode"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33757",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-23T18:30:14.125Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:07:33.024Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-33757",
"date": "2026-07-11",
"epss": "0.00411",
"percentile": "0.33106"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-33757\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-03-27T15:16:57.690\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-30T03:18:41.800\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform \\\"remote phishing\\\" by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"openbao\",\"product\":\"openbao\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 2.5.2\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Red Hat\",\"product\":\"Cryostat 4\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4\"]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L\",\"baseScore\":9.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":6.0},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L\",\"baseScore\":8.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.5},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L\",\"baseScore\":9.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":6.0}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-03-31T00:00:00+00:00\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-33757\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-384\"}]},{\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-384\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openbao:openbao:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.5.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F1489D2B-6994-46B2-8550-256B9EFCFD48\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#section-5.4\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e32103951925723e9787e33886ab6b6ec20f4964\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33757\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452269\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33757.json\",\"source\":\"0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Important",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-30T04:07:57+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-33757",
"id": "CVE-2026-33757",
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:10:58.639000+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "OpenBao: lack of user confirmation for OpenBao OIDC direct callback mode",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33757.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-33757\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-03-30T12:03:22.886283Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-30T12:04:08.100Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"OpenBao lacks user confirmation for OIDC direct callback mode\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.6, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"openbao\", \"product\": \"openbao\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.5.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e32103951925723e9787e33886ab6b6ec20f4964\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/e32103951925723e9787e33886ab6b6ec20f4964\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#section-5.4\", \"name\": \"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8628#section-5.4\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform \\\"remote phishing\\\" by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-384\", \"description\": \"CWE-384: Session Fixation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-33757\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-01T03:55:23.497Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-23T18:30:14.125Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-27T14:10:58.639Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…