CVE-2026-23168 (GCVE-0-2026-23168)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-14 16:01 – Updated: 2026-02-14 16:01
VLAI?
Title
flex_proportions: make fprop_new_period() hardirq safe
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
flex_proportions: make fprop_new_period() hardirq safe
Bernd has reported a lockdep splat from flexible proportions code that is
essentially complaining about the following race:
<timer fires>
run_timer_softirq - we are in softirq context
call_timer_fn
writeout_period
fprop_new_period
write_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence);
<hardirq is raised>
...
blk_mq_end_request()
blk_update_request()
ext4_end_bio()
folio_end_writeback()
__wb_writeout_add()
__fprop_add_percpu_max()
if (unlikely(max_frac < FPROP_FRAC_BASE)) {
fprop_fraction_percpu()
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence);
- sees odd sequence so loops indefinitely
Note that a deadlock like this is only possible if the bdi has configured
maximum fraction of writeout throughput which is very rare in general but
frequent for example for FUSE bdis. To fix this problem we have to make
sure write section of the sequence counter is irqsafe.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8 , < 0acc9ba7a1b5ba4d998c5753e709be904e179b75
(git)
Affected: a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8 , < 884b2590ffcc7222cbbd6298051f4c243cc36f5d (git) Affected: a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8 , < 78ede9ebd679dadf480dce6f7b798e3603f88348 (git) Affected: a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8 , < b91a84299d72ae0e05551e851e47cd3008bd025b (git) Affected: a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8 , < dd9e2f5b38f1fdd49b1ab6d3a85f81c14369eacc (git) |
||
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"lib/flex_proportions.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0acc9ba7a1b5ba4d998c5753e709be904e179b75",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "884b2590ffcc7222cbbd6298051f4c243cc36f5d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "78ede9ebd679dadf480dce6f7b798e3603f88348",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "b91a84299d72ae0e05551e851e47cd3008bd025b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "dd9e2f5b38f1fdd49b1ab6d3a85f81c14369eacc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a91befde350375b1ff954635acdde14dc92cd9a8",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"lib/flex_proportions.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.162",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.123",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.69",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.9",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.162",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.123",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.69",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nflex_proportions: make fprop_new_period() hardirq safe\n\nBernd has reported a lockdep splat from flexible proportions code that is\nessentially complaining about the following race:\n\n\u003ctimer fires\u003e\nrun_timer_softirq - we are in softirq context\n call_timer_fn\n writeout_period\n fprop_new_period\n write_seqcount_begin(\u0026p-\u003esequence);\n\n \u003chardirq is raised\u003e\n ...\n blk_mq_end_request()\n\t blk_update_request()\n\t ext4_end_bio()\n\t folio_end_writeback()\n\t\t__wb_writeout_add()\n\t\t __fprop_add_percpu_max()\n\t\t if (unlikely(max_frac \u003c FPROP_FRAC_BASE)) {\n\t\t fprop_fraction_percpu()\n\t\t\tseq = read_seqcount_begin(\u0026p-\u003esequence);\n\t\t\t - sees odd sequence so loops indefinitely\n\nNote that a deadlock like this is only possible if the bdi has configured\nmaximum fraction of writeout throughput which is very rare in general but\nfrequent for example for FUSE bdis. To fix this problem we have to make\nsure write section of the sequence counter is irqsafe."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-14T16:01:31.465Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0acc9ba7a1b5ba4d998c5753e709be904e179b75"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/884b2590ffcc7222cbbd6298051f4c243cc36f5d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78ede9ebd679dadf480dce6f7b798e3603f88348"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b91a84299d72ae0e05551e851e47cd3008bd025b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd9e2f5b38f1fdd49b1ab6d3a85f81c14369eacc"
}
],
"title": "flex_proportions: make fprop_new_period() hardirq safe",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-23168",
"datePublished": "2026-02-14T16:01:31.465Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-13T15:37:45.981Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-14T16:01:31.465Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-23168\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2026-02-14T16:15:57.023\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-02-18T17:52:44.520\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nflex_proportions: make fprop_new_period() hardirq safe\\n\\nBernd has reported a lockdep splat from flexible proportions code that is\\nessentially complaining about the following race:\\n\\n\u003ctimer fires\u003e\\nrun_timer_softirq - we are in softirq context\\n call_timer_fn\\n writeout_period\\n fprop_new_period\\n write_seqcount_begin(\u0026p-\u003esequence);\\n\\n \u003chardirq is raised\u003e\\n ...\\n blk_mq_end_request()\\n\\t blk_update_request()\\n\\t ext4_end_bio()\\n\\t folio_end_writeback()\\n\\t\\t__wb_writeout_add()\\n\\t\\t __fprop_add_percpu_max()\\n\\t\\t if (unlikely(max_frac \u003c FPROP_FRAC_BASE)) {\\n\\t\\t fprop_fraction_percpu()\\n\\t\\t\\tseq = read_seqcount_begin(\u0026p-\u003esequence);\\n\\t\\t\\t - sees odd sequence so loops indefinitely\\n\\nNote that a deadlock like this is only possible if the bdi has configured\\nmaximum fraction of writeout throughput which is very rare in general but\\nfrequent for example for FUSE bdis. To fix this problem we have to make\\nsure write section of the sequence counter is irqsafe.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\\n\\nflex_proportions: hacer que fprop_new_period() sea seguro para hardirq\\n\\nBernd ha reportado un lockdep splat del c\u00f3digo de proporciones flexibles que esencialmente se queja de la siguiente condici\u00f3n de carrera:\\n\\n\\nrun_timer_softirq - estamos en contexto de softirq\\n call_timer_fn\\n writeout_period\\n fprop_new_period\\n write_seqcount_begin(\u0026amp;p-\u0026gt;sequence);\\n\\n \\n ...\\n blk_mq_end_request()\\n\\t blk_update_request()\\n\\t ext4_end_bio()\\n\\t folio_end_writeback()\\n\\t\\t__wb_writeout_add()\\n\\t\\t __fprop_add_percpu_max()\\n\\t\\t if (unlikely(max_frac \u0026lt; FPROP_FRAC_BASE)) {\\n\\t\\t fprop_fraction_percpu()\\n\\t\\t\\tseq = read_seqcount_begin(\u0026amp;p-\u0026gt;sequence);\\n\\t\\t\\t - ve una secuencia impar por lo que entra en un bucle indefinido\\n\\nTenga en cuenta que un interbloqueo como este solo es posible si el bdi ha configurado una fracci\u00f3n m\u00e1xima de rendimiento de escritura, lo cual es muy raro en general pero frecuente, por ejemplo, para bdis FUSE. Para solucionar este problema, tenemos que asegurarnos de que la secci\u00f3n de escritura del contador de secuencia sea irqsafe.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0acc9ba7a1b5ba4d998c5753e709be904e179b75\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78ede9ebd679dadf480dce6f7b798e3603f88348\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/884b2590ffcc7222cbbd6298051f4c243cc36f5d\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b91a84299d72ae0e05551e851e47cd3008bd025b\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd9e2f5b38f1fdd49b1ab6d3a85f81c14369eacc\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…