CVE-2025-69222 (GCVE-0-2025-69222)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-07 21:17 – Updated: 2026-01-07 21:34
VLAI?
Title
LibreChat is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing restrictions
Summary
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)
vulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2.
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical)
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| danny-avila | LibreChat |
Affected:
>= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-69222",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-07T21:33:50.883724Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "LibreChat",
"vendor": "danny-avila",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)\nvulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "LibreChat is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing restrictions"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-69222",
"datePublished": "2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-29T19:03:19.357Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-69222\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-01-07T22:15:43.523\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-01-08T18:08:54.147\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Undergoing Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)\\nvulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":9.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.1,\"impactScore\":5.3}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-69222\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-07T21:33:50.883724Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:33:55.980Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"LibreChat is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing restrictions\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"danny-avila\", \"product\": \"LibreChat\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)\\nvulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-69222\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-12-29T19:03:19.357Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…