CVE-2025-34351 (GCVE-0-2025-34351)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-27 02:45 – Updated: 2025-12-09 19:11
VLAI

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. At the request of the MITRE TL-Root and following the CVE Program’s Dispute Policy, it has been determined that this assignment did not identify a valid vulnerability based on the vendor's product security model. Additionally, this assignment conflicts with an existing CVE (CVE-2023-48022).

Replaced by CVE-2023-48022

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T19:11:41.458Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. At the request of the MITRE TL-Root and following the CVE Program\u2019s Dispute Policy, it has been determined that this assignment did not identify a valid vulnerability based on the vendor\u0027s product security model. Additionally, this assignment conflicts with an existing CVE (CVE-2023-48022)."
            }
          ],
          "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. At the request of the MITRE TL-Root and following the CVE Program\u2019s Dispute Policy, it has been determined that this assignment did not identify a valid vulnerability based on the vendor\u0027s product security model. Additionally, this assignment conflicts with an existing CVE (CVE-2023-48022)."
        }
      ],
      "replacedBy": [
        "CVE-2023-48022"
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-34351",
    "datePublished": "2025-11-27T02:45:39.934Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-12-02T22:04:26.772Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-15T19:15:22.589Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T19:11:41.458Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. At the request of the MITRE TL-Root and following the CVE Program\u2019s Dispute Policy, it has been determined that this assignment did not identify a valid vulnerability based on the vendor\u0027s product security model. Additionally, this assignment conflicts with an existing CVE (CVE-2023-48022)."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2025-34351",
        "lastModified": "2025-12-09T20:15:53.973",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2025-11-27T03:15:58.790",
        "references": [],
        "sourceIdentifier": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.