cve-2025-26491
Vulnerability from cvelistv5

This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2025-26494.

Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z",
        "orgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
        "shortName": "siemens"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2025-26494."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
    "assignerShortName": "siemens",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-26491",
    "datePublished": "2025-02-11T10:29:20.922Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-02-11T08:34:48.167Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-26491\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"productcert@siemens.com\",\"published\":\"2025-02-11T11:15:17.613\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-02-14T20:15:37.930\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2025-26494.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77\", \"shortName\": \"siemens\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2025-26494.\"}]}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-26491\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"siemens\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-02-11T08:34:48.167Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-02-11T10:29:20.922Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2025-02-14T19:21:30.933Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.